Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA
Tuesday, March 11th, 2008 – 7:00 P.M.
Bloomfield Township Hall
Welcome to the Bloomfield Township Zoning Board of Appeals
meeting of March 11th, 2008.
As a brief introduction – The Zoning Board of Appeals is a
seven member, quasi-judicial body appointed by the Bloomfield
Township Board of Trustees. It is established and regulated by
the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act and the Code of the Charter
Township of Bloomfield for questions arising under the Zoning
Provisions of the Township. Matters pending before the Zoning
Board of Appeals are decided on a case-by-case basis.
The Zoning Board is empowered to: 1. Grant variances to the
Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, 2. Approve
accessory structures, and 3. Interpret the Zoning Ordinance.
Any appeal of a decision made by the Zoning Board of
Appeals is subject to Circuit Court Review.
Each case will be called separately, in the order shown on
tonight's agenda. There will be an opportunity for public
comment at one point during each case. All persons wishing to
address the Board will be asked to provide their name and
address at the podium. Given the number of appeals tonight,
please make your comments brief. You are encouraged to address
the Board, but if you do so, please address your comments to
me, the Chairperson, and not the applicant or other members of
the public.
Comments by the Neighborhood Association will be considered
as part of the factual information presented to the Board, but
it is not the determining factor for approval or denial.
Please confine comments to the specific request before the
Board.
For a request to be successful, an affirmative vote of at
least four members present is required. A tie will result in
the applicant being denied their request.
We hope this helps provide a better understanding of what
you can expect at tonight's meeting. Thank you. We’ll now call
the first case.
ATTENDANCE: Board Members, James Aldrich, David Buckley,
Brian Henry, Brian Kepes, Lisa Seneker, Sherry Stefanes, and
Chairman Corinne Khederian.
ABSENT: Robert Taylor
STAFF PRESENT: Patricia McCullough, Planning and Building
Director, Brenda Schultow, Code and Ordinance Officer, Robin
Carley, Development Coordinator, and Kathy Davis, Building
Secretary.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes of
February 12th, 2008.
Motion by Mr. Henry, Seconded by Ms. Stefanes to approve
the Zoning Board of Appeals minutes of February 12th, 2008 as
written.
Motion carried, 6 – 0.
Chairman Khederian addressed the audience and stated item
(9) 954 Hickory Heights Drive, has been rescheduled to April’s
agenda, at the petitioner’s request.
III. APPEALS
A. New Items
(1) 4319 Chamberlain Drive – J. Colton
Mr. Michael Gordon of Moiseev/Gordon Associates, Inc., was
present seeking approval for a 4.7 ft. encroachment into the
required 35 ft. rear yard setback for the construction of a
proposed single story addition, located 30.3 ft. from the rear
lot line, Lot 4, Orchard Valley, Section 32. The Code of the
Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III,
Section 42-527 requires a minimum of 35 ft. in the rear yard
setback. (19-32-351-012)
Mr. David Buckley, Board Member arrived.
Mr. Gordon addressed the Board with the request for a
4.7-foot encroachment into the rear yard setback for the
construction of a single story addition. Mr. Gordon made
reference to the site plan and indicated the proposed single
story addition would be to accommodate the needs for a modern
kitchen with adequate storage and closets. Mr. Gordon stated
this would be the best location given the existing septic
field. Mr. Gordon submitted subdivision association and the
adjacent neighbors comments to the Board.
Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Seneker in regard to
the appeal at 4319 Chamberlain Drive for a 4.7-foot
encroachment into the required 35-foot rear yard setback for
the construction of a single story addition, that the variance
be approved as requested. Based on the information presented,
the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all
of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must
obtain all necessary building permits.
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
(2) 3026 W. Ridge Court – A. McDonald
Mr. Gary Pipia of Oak Electric Service, was present seeking
approval for the installation of an accessory structure, a
proposed stand-by generator, screened with existing and
relocated evergreen plantings, located in a side yard
immediately adjacent to the southerly wall of the building,
Unit 15, Hickory Ridge Village, Section 9. The Code of the
Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-559 states that within a One-Family cluster
residential district, ground mounted mechanical and electrical
equipment shall be permitted in any rear yard when placed
immediately adjacent to the residential building.
(19-09-301-042)
Mr. Pipia addressed the Board with the request for a
proposed 25kW stand-by generator, to be screened with existing
and proposed evergreen plantings, to be located in a side yard
immediately adjacent to the southerly wall of the existing
building. Mr. Pipia made reference to the site plan and
indicated the proposed side yard location for the stand-by
generator. Mr. Pipia stated the proposed generator would be
placed adjacent to the existing air conditioning unit, which
is currently screened by an existing wall. Mr. Pipia stated
additional evergreens would be installed to screen the
proposed generator and the existing air-conditioning unit from
view of the street and the adjacent neighbor.
Chairman Khederian made mention of the comments received
from the Hickory Ridge Village Association for the variance
request.
Motion by Ms. Stefanes, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard
to the appeal at 3026 W. Ridge Court for the installation of a
stand-by generator located in a side yard within a One-Family
cluster residential district, that the variance be approved as
requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant
did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the
standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain an
electrical, a mechanical, and use/ordinance permits, and must
comply with the Noise Ordinance with 70dB(A) at property line.
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
(3) 6293 Dakota Circle - R. Ajluni
Mr. Steven Ramaekers of MainStreet Design Build, and Mr.
Roger Ajluni, homeowner, were present seeking approval for
following dimensional variances to allow renovations to the
existing non-conforming home on Lot 76, Sly Farms No. 2,
Section 29:
To encroach 6 ft. into the required 16 ft. side yard
setback for the construction of a proposed single-story
front addition, located 81.7 ft. from the front lot line
and 10 ft. from the northerly side lot line.
To encroach 2.5 ft. into the required 16 ft. side yard
setback and 20 ft. into the lakeside setback for the
construction of a proposed single-story rear addition,
located 13.5 ft. from the northerly side lot line and 80
ft. from the water’s edge, with the maximum lakeside
setback not to exceed 100 ft. The average setback of the
neighboring properties is 107.5 ft.
To encroach 5.9 ft. into the required 16 ft. side yard
setback for the installation of a proposed
air-conditioning unit screened with existing trees and
proposed evergreen plantings, located in a side yard 10.1
ft. from the northerly side lot line.
The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42,
Article IV, Section 42-558 states that non-conformities shall
not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended. The Code of the
Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III,
Section 42-527 requires a minimum of 16 ft. in the side yard
setback, that ground mounted mechanical and electrical
equipment in side yards shall be screened from view through
the use of evergreen plant material at least the height of the
equipment, that evergreen plant material utilized in
vegetative screen walls shall be maintained in a healthy
condition, and that in those instances where waterfront
properties have been developed with waterfront setbacks of
greater than 50 ft., new construction or remodeling of a
principal building shall be set back from the waterfront the
average of the setback of the principal buildings on the
nearest improved waterfront lots within 500 ft. of each side
of the lot in question, however, in no instance shall a
setback in excess of 100 ft. be required. (19-29-301-018)
Mr. Ramaekers addressed the Board with a three-part
variance request. Mr. Ramaekers submitted the neighbor’s
approval and the comments from Wing Lake Farms for the
variance requests. Mr. Ramaekers addressed each variance
request individually and in detail to the Board. Mr. Ramaekers
made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the
first variance request, an encroachment of 6-feet into the
required 16 ft. side yard setback for the construction of a
proposed single-story front addition, located 81.7 ft. from
the front lot line and 10 ft. from the northerly side lot
line. Mr. Ramaekers stated the addition off of the front would
add two (2) bedrooms to the existing home. Mr. Ramaekers
addressed the second variance request, and indicated revisions
were submitted to reflect to encroach 2.5 ft. into the
required 16 ft. side yard setback and 12.6 ft. into the
lakeside setback for the construction of a proposed
single-story rear addition, located 13.5 ft. from the
northerly side lot line and 87.4 ft. from the water’s edge,
with the maximum lakeside setback not to exceed 100 ft. The
average setback of the neighboring properties is 118.6 ft. Mr.
Ramaekers made reference on the proposed site plan and
indicated the variance request would allow to construct a
master suite addition off of the rear of the home. Mr.
Ramaekers addressed the last variance request to the Board to
encroach 5.9 ft. into the required 16 ft. side yard setback
for the installation of a proposed air-conditioning unit
screened with existing trees and proposed evergreen plantings,
located in a side yard 10.1 ft. from the northerly side lot
line. Mr. Ramaekers made reference to the site plan and stated
based on the comments from the Wing Lake Farms Association,
the air-conditioning unit is to be away from the front of the
house. Mr. Ramaekers indicated the proposed location for the
air-conditioning unit would encroach 5.9 ft. into the required
16 ft. side yard setback, to be screened with existing trees
and proposed evergreen plantings, located in a side yard 10.1
ft. from the northerly side lot line.
Dr. Sal Forman, resident at 6307 Dakota Circle, was present
and spoke in support of the variance requests as submitted.
Mr. Ajluni, homeowner, was present and asked the Board for
consideration. Mr. Ajluni stated over the years his family has
grown however, the house has not.
Ms. Seneker made mention of a letter submitted from Mr. and
Mrs. Norman Hyman, residents at 6233 Dakota Circle. Ms.
Seneker indicated the Hyman’s were in support of the variances
as requested with the exception of the request for the
lakeside setback.
Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regard to
the appeal at 6293 Dakota Circle to extend an existing
nonconforming home, to encroach 6 ft. into the required 16 ft.
northerly side setback for the construction of a front single
story addition, to encroach 2.5 ft. into the required 16 ft.
side yard set back and revised as submitted 12.6 ft into the
required 100 ft. lakeside setback for the construction of a
rear single-story addition, and to encroach 5.9 ft. into the
required 16 ft. northerly side setback for the installation of
an air-conditioning unit, that the variances be approved as
requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant
did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the
standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all
necessary building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing
permits.
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
(4) 4085 Maple Road West – Maple & Telegraph LLC
Mr. Stuart Frankel, property owner, was present seeking
approval for a variance of six (6) parking spaces for the
inclusion of a proposed nail salon, located at the shopping
center at the Southeast corner of Maple Road West and
Telegraph Road, Acreage Parcel C329-A-1, Section 33. The Code
of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-560 establishes that twelve (12) spaces are
required for this type of use, with only six (6) spaces
approved for this retail tenant space. (19-33-101-001)
Mr. Frankel addressed the Board with the request for six
(6) parking spaces for the proposed nail salon. Mr. Frankel
made reference to the site plan and indicated the location of
the proposed tenant space. Mr. Frankel stated the proposed
nail salon would occupy approximately 1,100 square feet within
an existing shopping center. Mr. Frankel commented the
proposed tenant was previously before the Board January 8th,
2008 asking for nine (9) parking spaces, which failed. Mr.
Frankel stated the floor plan has been revised by eliminating
one (1) station and chair, which would reduce the parking
spaces to six (6) for the proposed nail salon. Mr. Frankel
made reference to the existing tenants Mai Kai Cleaners and
Duru’s Tailors and commented one (1) staff member and one (1)
customer occupy them both during business hours. Mr. Frankel
indicated the proposed nail salon would not hinder over
lapping of parking within the existing shopping center.
Mr. Jack Tham, tenant of Liquid Salon, at 6652 Telegraph
Road, was present and spoke in objection of another salon
being within the same corner.
Ms. Sue Vandamm, proposed tenant, Venetian Nails, was
present and stated the business hours would be Monday –
Saturday, 9:30 AM to 7:00 PM.
Chairman Khederian identified a memo submitted from Mr.
Michael McCully, Township Fire Marshal, dated February 14th,
2008. The memo stated the Fire Department is not in favor of
granting a variance of the parking ordinance as it relates to
the above address as requested, it would only add to the
current problem and may reduce the ability to properly provide
emergency services at the shopping center.
Mr. Buckley questioned would the Township monitor the
tenant to verify that additional workstations have not been
added.
Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building,
replied the Township would periodically verify the tenant
space that additional workstations have not been added.
Motion by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to
the appeal at 4085 Maple Road West for a variance of six (6)
parking spaces for the inclusion of a proposed nail salon,
that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the
information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the
Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical
difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary building
permits.
Motion carried, 5 – 2.
YEAS: Buckley, Aldrich, Henry, Kepes, Stefanes
NAYS: Seneker, Khederian
(5) 7420 & 7530 Inner Circle Drive – B. Fienman
Mr. James Scott of James C. Scott & Associates, and Dr.
Fienman, homeowner, were present seeking approval for
accessory structures, two 2’ x 2’ x 4’ high proposed brick
piers with 4’ high proposed electronic gates, screened with
existing and proposed plantings, located in a required front
yard at each side of the driveway entrance approximately 70
ft. from the front lot line, Hidden Brook Lane, and 35 ft.
from the easterly side lot line, Acreage Parcels, Section 31.
The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42,
Article IV, Section 559 states that accessory structures shall
not be erected in any yard, except a rear yard, shall be
screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous
material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the
year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy
condition, and shall require the review and approval of the
Zoning Board of Appeals. The Code of the Charter Township of
Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-566 states that
fences in a residential district must be located in a side or
rear yard. (19-31-376-033; 036; 038; 039)
Mr. Scott addressed the Board with the request for two (2)
2’ x 2’ x 4’ high proposed brick piers with 4’ high proposed
electronic gates to be screened with existing and proposed
plantings, located in a front yard at each side of the
driveway entrance. Mr. Scott made reference to the proposed
site plan and indicated the location of the two (2) brick
piers and electronic gates. Mr. Scott indicated the proposed
electronic gates would be located 70-feet off the road
right-of-way of Hidden Brook Lane. Mr. Scott stated the
materials of the proposed piers would match the stone on the
existing home. The proposed gate material would be iron and
black in color. Mr. Scott made reference to the photographs
and indicated the existing evergreen plantings for the
proposed accessory structures.
Motion by Ms. Stefanes, Seconded by Mr. Kepes in regard to
the appeal at 7420 and 7530 Inner Circle Drive for the
construction of two (2) piers, that the request be approved as
submitted, and the variance for the construction of two (2)
piers and gates located in a front yard be granted. Based on
the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate
compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate
all of the standards for practical difficulty. Contingent upon
the removal of the two (2) existing warning signs. Petitioner
to submit a Hold Harmless Affidavit to the Township, the gates
should be equipped with a quick release mechanism and a knox
box or similar knox device approved by the Fire Marshal must
be installed on the gate, and two (2) permits must be obtained
(an ordinance permit for the piers and an electrical permit
for the gates)
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
(6) 3555 Forest Hill Road – Maplewood Homes, LLC
Seeking approval for existing accessory structures, three
4’ x 4’ x 3.2’ high brick piers, screened with proposed
plantings, one located in the front yard and two located in
the rear yard approximately 68 ft. from the southerly side lot
line, Lot 28, Brookside Hills Subdivision, Section 16. The
Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter
42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory
structures shall not be erected in any yard, except a rear
yard, shall be screened from adjacent residences with
evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view
twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be
maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the
review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
(19-16-203-002)
No one was present for this item.
Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Seneker to move this
item to the end of the agenda to allow the applicant to be
present,
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
(7) 1335 Forest Lane – A. Booth
Ms. Zoe Booth, homeowner, was present seeking approval for
the construction of an accessory use/structure, an existing
56’ x 27’ ice rink with 1 ft. side boards to be used on an
annual basis, December through February, screened with
existing trees, located in a front yard between the two
driveway entrances 22 ft. from the front lot line, Lot 10,
Supervisor’s Plat of Berkshire Forest, Section 34. The Code of
the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-559 states that an accessory use/structure shall
not be erected in any yard, except a rear yard, shall be
screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous
material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the
year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy
condition, and shall require the review and approval of the
Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-34-377-002)
Ms. Booth addressed the Board with the request for an
existing 56’ x 27’ ice rink with 1-foot side boards to be used
on an annual basis, December through February. Ms. Booth
presented the Board with the adjacent neighbors comments. Ms.
Booth made reference to the site plan and indicated the
location of the ice rink would be in the front yard. Ms. Booth
stated the rear yard is sloped which, would not allow for an
ice rink to be installed.
The following neighbors granted approval by submitting
letters to the file, Mr. Fotini Lazaros, resident at 1300
Forest Lane, Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Kaman, residents at 1255
Forest Lane, Ms. Patricia Jacoby, resident at 1295 Forest
Lane, Mr. John Bosley, resident at 1350 Forest Lane, Mr.
Stephen Chickonoski, resident at 1400 Forest Lane, and Ms.
Reem Alsabti, resident at 1451 Forest Lane.
Motion by Mr. Henry, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to
the appeal at 1335 Forest Lane for an existing ice rink, that
the request be approved as submitted, and the variance for an
existing ice rink located in a front yard be granted. Based on
the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate
compliance with
Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the
standards for practical difficulty. Ice rink dates,
installation November 15th – March 30th to be removed,
with the lawn to be restored to the condition of the
previous summer and materials to be stored out of sight. Ice
rink times of use: 3:00 – 9:00 PM, weekends to be daylight
hours. No exterior lighting to be installed. Petitioner must
submit an ordinance permit application prior to each
installation.
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
(8) 5263 Franklin Road – D. O’Bryan
Mr. Dennis O’Byran, homeowner, was present seeking approval
for the construction of an accessory structure, a proposed 58’
x 51.3’ x 26.3’ high detached two-story garage to include
electrical and plumbing utilities, screened with existing
trees and proposed evergreen plantings, located in front
yards, Franklin Road and Clarendon frontages of Lots 63 and
64, Woodcrest Farms No. 1, Section 20. The Code of the Charter
Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559
states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any
yard, except a rear yard, shall not exceed one (1) story or
fourteen (14) ft. in height, shall be screened from adjacent
residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will
obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such
vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and
shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of
Appeals. (19-20-327-030)
Mr. O’Bryan addressed the Board with the request for a
proposed 58’ x 51.3’ x 26.3’ high detached two-story garage to
include electrical and plumbing utilities. Mr. O’Bryan made
reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the location
and square footage of the detached garage would be 1,961. Mr.
O’Bryan stated the proposed detached garage would be utilized
to store the vehicles, boat, and toys that are currently
stored in the front and side yard of his home. Mr. O’Bryan
stated he previously requested an 11-foot variance for a
detached garage in 1997, however do to the cost the garage was
never constructed.
Mr. Burt Mularoni, resident at 1572 Clarendon, was present
and spoke in opposition of the variance request.
Mr. Lee Saperstein, resident at 1530 Clarendon, was present
and spoke in opposition of the variance request.
Mr. Burt Mularoni Sr., resident at 22236 Village Pines, was
present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.
Mr. O’Bryan replied to the neighbor’s comments. Mr. O’Bryan
stated the proposed detached garage would infringe upon the
existing tennis court; therefore the existing tennis court
would be demolished to allow for the new detached garage to be
constructed.
Mr. Aldrich questioned would the proposed garage have
plumbing.
Mr. O’Bryan replied the purpose of the plumbing would be
for a utility tub in the garage and the second floor would be
utilized for storage.
Ms. Stefanes commented to the Board that a request for
plumbing for a utility tub is not out of the ordinary for a
garage. Ms. Stefanes commented given the size of the home the
proposed detached garage would be within proportion.
Motion by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to
the appeal at 5263 Franklin Road for the construction of a
proposed detached garage be approved as submitted, and the
variance to locate the proposed 26.3 ft. high detached garage
in front yards be granted. Based on the information presented,
the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55
Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for
practical difficulty. Petitioner must submit a Single Family
Affidavit to the Township, and obtain building, electrical,
and plumbing permits prior to construction.
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
Item rescheduled to April 8th, 2008 agenda, at the
petitioner’s request.
(9) 954 Hickory Heights Drive – D. Dagostino
Seeking approval for an existing accessory structure, an 8’
x 7’ x 9’ high storage shed with electrical, screened with
existing trees, located in a rear yard immediately adjacent to
the wall of the building 20 ft. from the westerly side lot
line, Lot 73, Hickory Heights, Section 13. The Code of the
Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall be
screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous
material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the
year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy
condition, and shall require the review and approval of the
Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-13-428-007)
(10) 5157 Wing Lake Road – S. Shammami
Mr. Thomas Ryan, was present representing the homeowner,
seeking approval for an accessory structure, a partially
installed 8.5’ x 8.5’ x 7.8’ high wooden storage shed without
utilities including a .8 ft. high wooden platform, screened
with existing trees and proposed evergreen plantings, located
in a rear yard 9.5 ft. from the southerly side and rear lot
lines, Lot 8, The Dells of Bloomfield, Section 20. The Code of
the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be
located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side or rear lot
line, shall be screened from adjacent residences with
evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view
twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be
maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the
review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
(19-20-401-009)
Mr. Ryan addressed the Board with an apology regarding the
miscommunication from his office at the previous meeting held
on January 8th, 2008, that there was no representation for
this item. Mr. Ryan presented to the Board a revised plan
indicating a 12’ x 12’ wooden slab, located 3-feet away from
the east and south property line for the placement of an 8.5’
x 8.5’ x 7.8’ high partially installed, wooden storage shed.
Mr. Ryan made reference to the site plan and indicated the
location of 9.5-feet for the partially installed storage shed
and suggested with the removal of 3.5-feet off of the existing
12’ x 12’ wooden slab, would require a 3-foot variance request
off the east and south property line. Mr. Ryan made reference
to the photographs provided and commented the storage shed
would be screened by the existing trees. Mr. Ryan commented
from the previous meetings it was suggested that a garage be
constructed to meet the homeowner’s needs. Mr. Ryan stated the
request is for a simple storage shed, which is allowed by
ordinances.
Ms. Seneker asked why the Board was hearing this item
again.
Ms. Patti McCullough, Planning and Building Director,
replied the request has been revised with a new proposal for
the storage shed.
Ms. Seneker asked could the storage shed be located
adjacent to the home.
Mr. Kas Dalaly, homeowner, was present and replied if the
storage shed were to be relocated it would be an eye sore and
a detriment to him, given there are windows along the rear of
the home.
Mr. Steve Vanker, resident at 5250 Kellen Lane, was present
and spoke in opposition of the variance request.
Ms. Julia Vanker, resident at 5250 Kellen Lane, was present
and spoke in opposition of the variance request.
Ms. Michelle Margosian, resident at 5374 Echo Lane, and
representative of the Dells of Bloomfield, was present and
spoke in opposition of the variance request. Ms. Margosian
stated the association prohibits shed within The Dells of
Bloomfield.
Mr. Ryan replied and made reference to the site plan and
stated the existing 12’ x 12’ wooden slab the homeowner would
remove 3.5-feet closest to the easterly and southerly property
line, which would place the storage shed 13-feet from the
property line, which leaves a 3-foot variance request. Mr.
Ryan stated additional arborvitaes would be installed on the
west side to screen the storage shed from view of Wing Lake
Road.
Motion by Mr. Henry, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to
the appeal at 5157 Wing Lake Road for a partial installed
shed, that the request be denied as submitted. Based on the
information presented, the applicant did not demonstrate
compliance with Section 42-55 Standards given the storage shed
could be placed within other areas of the property, the
storage shed will hinder and discourage the adjacent
neighbors, given their comments received at tonight’s meeting,
the nature, location, size and site layout of the storage shed
is not harmonious district. The shed location, size, and site
layout is objectionable to nearby residents and the
subdivision association. The partially installed wooden
storage shed and existing wooden slab is to be removed
immediately upon approval of the minutes and the lawn to be
restored by May 1st, 2008.
Mr. Kepes asked the Board for discussion and stated in his
opinion the homeowner has provided sufficient information
given there are windows on the rear of his home that this is
an undo burden. Mr. Kepes made reference to the neighbor’s
property and indicated the existing accessory structure, which
is visible.
Motion carried, 6 – 1.
YEAS: Henry, Buckley, Aldrich, Seneker, Stefanes, Khederian
NAYS: Kepes
Chairman Khederian re-addressed item (6) to be heard.
(6) 3555 Forest Hill Road – Maplewood Homes, LLC
Mr. Jason Drewback, of Design Studio, was present seeking
approval for existing accessory structures, three 4’ x 4’ x
3.2’ high brick piers, screened with proposed plantings, one
located in the front yard and two located in the rear yard
approximately 68 ft. from the southerly side lot line, Lot 28,
Brookside Hills Subdivision, Section 16. The Code of the
Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be
erected in any yard, except a rear yard, shall be screened
from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous
material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the
year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy
condition, and shall require the review and approval of the
Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-16-203-002)
Mr. Drewback addressed the Board with the request for three
(3) existing 4’ x 4’ x 3.2’ high brick piers, screened with
proposed plantings, one located in the front yard and two
located in the rear yard approximately 68 ft. from the
southerly side lot line. Mr. Drewback made reference to the
site plan and indicated the Board previously approved four (4)
4’ x 4’ 3.3’ high stone pillars, located in a front yard at
each side of the two driveway entrances of Forest Hill Road
frontage on June 12th, 2007.
Mr. Hal Pringle, resident at 3660 Forest Hill, was present
and spoke in opposition of the variance request. Mr. Pringle
stated the previously approved pillars are closer to 5-feet in
height and are falling apart at the top.
Mr. Ed Anderson, resident at 3585 Brookside Drive, and
Chairman of Brookside Hills Protective Association, was
present and stated he has not received nor reviewed the plans
presented to the Board. Mr. Anderson made reference to the
site plan and stated his concern was with the restoration of
the pond, which has now become more decorative.
The Board discussed the existing condition of the pillars
and asked for verification and questioned the restoration pond
that was discussed at the June 12th meeting and indicated the
stipulation that the grade and landscaping material as it
relates to the pond, be installed in conformance with the plan
dated June 16th, 2006 prepared by Robert – Thomas Landscape
Environments.
Ms. Patti McCullough, Planning and Building Director,
shared the comments received from the Township Engineering and
Environmental Department, who will be reviewing the pond
restoration. Ms. McCullough commented she would forward the
concerns to the Engineering and Environmental Department.
Motion made by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Ms. Seneker in
regard to the appeal at 3555 Forest Hill Road for the
construction of (3) three piers, that the variance request be
tabled to allow the applicant to provide plans to the
homeowners association and seek their comments and for the
Building Division to perform an site inspection to verify the
height and condition of the existing pillars and report back
to the Board.
Motion carried, 7 – 0.
IV. GENERAL BUSINESS
Next Board Meeting – April 8th, 2008
V. ADJOURNMENT
Respectfully submitted,
Patricia McCullough, Director
Planning and Building Division
kd
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPROVALS SHALL BE VALID FOR A
PERIOD NO LONGER THAN ONE YEAR UNLESS A BUILDING PERMIT HAS
BEEN OBTAINED.
IN THE EVENT THAT AN APPEAL IS APPROVED, CONTINGENT UPON
THE SUBMITTAL OF AN AFFIDAVIT, PLEASE ALLOW UP TO FOURTEEN
(14) BUSINESS DAYS TO PROCESS THE DOCUMENT.
APPROVED MINUTES WILL BE AVAILABLE ON LINE AND AT THE
PLANNING DIVISION AFTER THE NEXT SCHEDULED BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING.
Home |
Government |
Services |
Community |
Current Events |
Resources
Contact Us |
E-mail List |
Forms
Still can't find what you're looking for?
Use our comprehensive Search or
Site Map pages!
Charter Township of Bloomfield
4200 Telegraph Road
P.O. Box 489
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303-0489
248.433.7700
This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer
5.5 or higher and Netscape 6.0 or higher.
Having trouble accessing our site forms?
Your browser may not have the Acrobat Reader plug-in
that is required.
Click here to download a free copy of this software.
Site Design/Development
by

Proudly serving our community online since
1999.
Named #1 Township Website in Michigan by Cyber-state.org
Site Use
Policy
All information © 2008 Bloomfield
Township, Michigan
|