Contact Us
E-Mail List
Forms

Home Government Services Community Current Events Resources
Bloomfield Government
Current Events Overview
Township Annual Report
Administration
Agendas
Budget
Capital Improvement Program
Directory
Employment Opportunities
History Records
Links
Millage Renewals
Minutes
Ordinances and Resolutions
Organization Chart
Other Officials
Polling Locations and Precincts
Public Meetings
Trustees
Site Map

 

 
Advanced Search Options

 

Government > Minutes

Overview  |  Board of Trustees  |  Planning Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA
Tuesday, December 11th, 2007 – 7:00 P.M.
Bloomfield Township Hall

Welcome to the Bloomfield Township Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of December 11th, 2007.

As a brief introduction – The Zoning Board of Appeals is a seven member, quasi-judicial body appointed by the Bloomfield Township Board of Trustees. It is established and regulated by the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act and the Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield for questions arising under the Zoning Provisions of the Township. Matters pending before the Zoning Board of Appeals are decided on a case-by-case basis.

The Zoning Board is empowered to: 1. Grant variances to the Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, 2. Approve accessory structures, and 3. Interpret the Zoning Ordinance.

Any appeal of a decision made by the Zoning Board of Appeals is subject to Circuit Court Review.

Each case will be called separately, in the order shown on tonight's agenda. There will be an opportunity for public comment at one point during each case. All persons wishing to address the Board will be asked to provide their name and address at the podium. Given the number of appeals tonight, please make your comments brief. You are encouraged to address the Board, but if you do so, please address your comments to me, the Chairperson, and not the applicant or other members of the public.

Comments by the Neighborhood Association will be considered as part of the factual information presented to the Board, but it is not the determining factor for approval or denial. Please confine comments to the specific request before the Board.

For a request to be successful, an affirmative vote of at least four members present is required. A tie will result in the applicant being denied their request.

We hope this helps provide a better understanding of what you can expect at tonight's meeting. Thank you. We’ll now call the first case.

I. ATTENDANCE: Board Members, James Aldrich, David Buckley, Brian Kepes, Jane Reisinger, Lisa Seneker, Robert Taylor, and Chairman Corinne Khederian

STAFF PRESENT: Patricia McCullough, Planning and Building Director, Brenda Schultow, Code and Ordinance Officer, Robin Carley, Development Coordinator, and Kathy Davis, Building Secretary.

II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

a. Approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes of November 20th, 2007

Motion by Ms. Seneker, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich to approve the Zoning Board of Appeals minutes of November 20th, 2007 as written.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

III. APPEALS
a. Tabled Items

(1T) 1450 Square Lake Road West – N. Yatooma
Mr. Ross Schoenherr of Schoenherr Homes was present seeking approval for the following permission requests and dimensional variances to allow renovations to the residential property on Lots 61 and 62, Telegraph-Square Lake Acres Subdivision, Section 5:
* The construction of proposed limestone retaining walls with an overall height of 8 ft., screened with existing and proposed plantings, located in the front and easterly side yards, 13 ft. from the easterly side lot line.
* The construction of a proposed 45’ x 90’ sports court with two 17.5 ft. high light fixtures, screened with existing and proposed plantings, located in a rear yard 11 ft. from the easterly side lot line and 92 ft. from the rear lot line.
The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory use/structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall not be located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side or rear lot line, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, such vegetation shall be maintained in a health condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-05-377-039)

Mr. Schoenherr addressed the Board with a two-part variance request. Mr. Schoenherr made reference to the site plan and indicated the proposed 8-foot high limestone retaining wall to be located in the front yard and easterly side yard. Mr. Schoenherr stated the purpose of the retaining wall would be to support a 6-foot extension of the driveway to allow for the garage to be utilized. Mr. Schoenherr provided the approval letter to the Board from the adjacent neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Garbis Bagdasarian, residents at 1448 W. Square Lake Road. Mr. Schoenherr identified the proposed 45’ x 90’ sports court with two (2) 17.5-foot high light fixtures. Mr. Schoenherr commented the proposed sports court would be screened with

existing and proposed evergreen trees. Mr. Schoenherr made reference to the letter of support provided by Mr. & Mrs. Garbis Bagdasarian for the sports court and lighting variance requests.

Ms. Rita Dubois, resident at 1541 Bataan, was present and spoke in opposition of the proposed lighting for the sports court.

Mr. Walter Kummer, resident at 1501 Bataan, was present and spoke in opposition of the proposed lighting for the sports court, the fencing of the rear yard vs. fencing the pool area and the drainage concerns.

Chairman Khederian addressed the Board and stated in the past the Township has never granted a variance for lights for a sports court.

Ms. Reisinger questioned the fence location.

Mr. Schoenherr replied the fence is to enclose the entire rear yard, including the swimming pool, which is permitted by the Building Department.

Chairman Khederian questioned the concerns raised in the letter from Mr. & Mrs. Garbis Bagdasarian, residents at 1448 W. Square Lake Road.

Mr. Schoenherr replied the screening of the sports court would adhere to the proposed landscape plan, the mature walnut tree along the fence line, would not be removed, and the existing vibuurnum and two (2) trees on the property line would remain.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Ms. Reisinger in regard to the appeal at 1450 West Square Lake Road for the construction of retaining walls and a sports court, that the request be approved as submitted, without the lighting for the sports court, and the variance for the construction of retaining walls located in the front and easterly side yards 13-feet from the easterly side lot line, and for the construction of a sports court located 11-feet from the easterly side lot line be granted. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty. Approval is contingent upon the sports court to be screened per landscape plan presented, the hours of use for the sports court is 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM and the petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 6 – 1.
YEAS: Taylor, Reisinger, Aldrich, Buckley, Seneker, Khederian
NAYS: Kepes

b. New Items

(1) Palms Road & Kingston Court - Eastway Land Co.
Mr. Bob Casadei of Casadei Homes was present seeking approval to relocate an existing 8’ x 5’ high (40 sq. ft.) ground sign 1 ft. above ground level, located on a narrow parcel considered open space within the Eastway Farms Subdivision approximately 100 from the front lot line, 14 ft. from the southerly lot line, and 40 ft. from an occupied residence, Acreage Parcel, Section 11. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-568 states that it shall be permissible for a real estate broker or builder to erect one (1) sign not to exceed a total surface area of sixty (60) square feet nor an overall heights of five (5) feet, the lower edge of which shall not be less than eighteen (18) inches above the surrounding ground level, to advertise the lots and/or buildings erected in any one (1) subdivision, that no such sign shall be erected or maintained within one hundred (100) ft. of any occupied residence unless the written consent of the owner and occupant is first obtained, and that such sign shall be permitted after the review and approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-11-226-033)

Mr. Casadei addressed the Board with the request to relocate an existing 8’ x 5’ high ground sign 1-foot above ground level, to be located on a narrow parcel, open space within the Eastway Farms Subdivision approximately 100-feet from the front lot line. Mr. Casadei stated Mr. and Mrs. Christopher Germano at 756 Palms are the nearest occupied residents and have signed the site plan as presented.

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the subdivision comments submitted.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regard to the appeal at Palms Road & Kingston Court to install a sign 12” above the surrounding ground level that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(2) 2831 Woodcreek Way – L. Lockwood
Mr. Lewis Lockwood, homeowner, was present seeking approval for existing accessory structures, two air-conditioning units, screened with existing evergreen plantings, located in a side yard 11.8 ft. from the northerly side lot line, Lot 13, North Bloomfield Hills Subdivision No. 1, Section 11. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that ground mounted mechanical and electrical equipment shall not be located in the required 16 ft. side yard setback, must be screened from view through the use of evergreen plant material at least the height of the equipment, located at the point of placement of the equipment; and maintained in a healthy condition. (19-11-276-008)

Mr. Lockwood addressed the Board with the request for two (2) existing air-conditioners, located in the side yard. Mr. Lockwood made reference to the site plan and indicated the location of the existing air-conditioners and the existing evergreen screening of the units.

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the subdivision comments submitted.

Motion by Ms. Seneker, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to the appeal at 2831 Woodcreek Way for the existing two (2) air-conditioning units within the required side yard setback, that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(3) 671 Hickory Heights Drive – G. Sheets
Mr. Glen Sheets, homeowner, was present seeking approval for a 7.5 ft. encroachment into the required 35 ft. rear yard setback to replace the existing non-conforming deck, located in a rear yard 26 ft. from the westerly side lot line and 27.5 ft. from the rear lot line, Lot 136, Hickory Heights No. 1, Section 13. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III, Section 42-527 requires a minimum of 35 ft. in the rear yard setback. (19-13-401-002)

Mr. Sheets addressed the Board with the request for a 7.5-foot encroachment into the rear yard setback to replace an existing non-conforming deck. Mr. Sheets stated the existing deck is not well constructed. Mr. Sheets made reference to the site plan and indicated the location of the proposed deck with having access from the kitchen vs. access from the dining room as presently exists. Mr. Sheets indicated the proposed deck would be widen by 4’6” to allow for both dining and space for walking traffic. Mr. Sheets stated the Hickory Heights Property Owners Association has provided comments.

Motion by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Ms. Seneker in regard to the appeal at 671 Hickory Heights Drive to encroach 7.5-feet into the required 35-foot rear yard setback, that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(4) 3660 Franklin Road – N. White
Mr. Bill White, homeowner, was present seeking approval for a 24 ft. encroachment into the required 40 ft. front yard setback for the construction of a proposed first and second floor addition to the existing non-conforming building, located 16 ft. from the front lot line, Part of Lot 18 and all of Lots 19 and 20, Supervisor’s Plat of North Devon Acres No. 1, Section 17. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Section 42, Article IV, Section 42-558 states that non-conformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Section 42, Article III, Section 42-527 requires a minimum of 40 ft. in the front yard setback. (19-17-276-036)

Mr. White addressed the Board with the request for a 24-foot encroachment into the front yard setback for the construction of the proposed first and second floor addition to the existing non-conforming building. Mr. White made reference to the proposed plan and indicated the proposed addition would be in the middle of the home with the roofline to be the same.

Ms. Seneker made mention of the subdivision association comments submitted.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Ms. Reisinger in regard to the appeal at 3660 Franklin Road for a 24-foot encroachment into the required 40-foot front yard setback for the construction of a first and second floor addition to the existing non-conforming building that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(5) 3194 Bradford Drive East – B. Salman
Mr. Bassam Salman, homeowner, was present seeking approval for an existing 6 ft. high replacement fence, located in the secondary front and rear yards, Lincoln Road frontage, within a front yard setback, Lot 128, Westchester Village No. 1, Section 34. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, section 42-566 states that fences in a residential district must be located in a side or rear yard and shall not exceed 4 ft. in height. (19-34-180-009)

Mr. Bassam addressed the Board with the request for an existing 6-foot high wood privacy fence. Mr. Bassam stated the fence prior was depilated and in need of replacement.

Ms. Reisinger questioned would the fence posts need to be reversed to face the petitioner’s property.

Ms. Patti McCullough, Planning and Building Director, replied the fence posts would have to be reversed to face inward onto the petitioner’s property.

Mr. Taylor questioned has the subdivision association submitted their comments to the Township in regards to the variance request.

Mr. Bassam replied the subdivision association indicated to him at the meeting of November 7th, 2007, that a letter would be provided to the Township prior to the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting.

Ms. Seneker made mention of a letter received in support of the variance from Mr. David Wachowiak, resident at 3195 East Breckenridge.

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regard to the appeal at 3194 Bradford Drive East for the existing 6-foot high replacement fence that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Fence posts to be reversed to face inward onto the petitioner’s property and the petitioner must obtain a permit.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(6) 691 South Hills Road – R. Lloyd
Mr. Lloyd Reuss, homeowner, was present seeking approval for the installation of an accessory structure, a proposed stand-by generator screened with existing trees, located in a rear yard immediately adjacent to an existing detached garage/workshop, Part of Lots 13 and 14, Brookside Hills Subdivision, Section 16. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that ground mounted mechanical or electrical equipment shall be permitted in any rear yard when placed immediately adjacent to the residential building. (19-16-252-033)

Mr. Reuss addressed the Board with the request for the installation of a 10kw stand-by generator located in the rear yard behind the existing garage to be screened with existing trees. Mr. Reuss made reference to the photographs and stated the proposed location is a wooded area.

Ms. Reisinger suggested additional screening from the street side of Brookside Drive for the proposed generator.

Ms. Patti McCullough, Planning and Building Director, replied the proposed stand-by generator is to be located in the rear yard. Ms. McCullough stated given this proposed stand-by generator would be immediately adjacent to the detached garage in the rear yard, screening would not be required.

Mr. Aldrich questioned the distance from the detached garage to Brookside Drive.

Mr. Reuss replied the distance from the detached garage to Brookside Drive is 50-feet.

Ms. Seneker made mention of the letter received in support of the variance request from Mr. Stanley Frankel, resident at 663 South Hills Road.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Seneker in regard to the appeal at 691 South Hills Road for the installation of a generator located adjacent to a detached garage, that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits and generator must comply with Township Noise Ordinance with 70dB(A) at property line.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(7) 1116 Long Lake Road West – Bank One/JP Morgan
Mr. Jeff Leib attorney, was present seeking approval for additional signage, a proposed 7.2’ x 1.1’ high (7.9 sq. ft.) non-illuminated permanent wall sign with a 1.1’ x 1.1’ (1.2 sq. ft.) logo for JP Morgan, Devon Gables Court frontage, in addition to the existing signage for Chase Bank, the 9.4 sq. ft. permanent wall sign, located on the east elevation, Telegraph Road frontage, and the 20.2 sq. ft. ground sign, Part of Outlots A and B, Devon Gables, Section 16. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-568 states that in those instances where a ground is utilized within the O-1, Office, zoned district, a wall sign not to exceed ten (10) square feet in area may also be utilized. (19-16-154-007)

Mr. Leib addressed the Board with the request for an additional wall sign to be located on the west side of the building. Mr. Leib stated the proposed wall sign would not be illuminated. Mr. Leib indicated that JP Morgan did not have any identification on the site, as Chase Bank utilized both a wall and ground sign for the property. Mr. Leib stated the Design Review Board approved the additional wall sign as presented. Mr. Leib commented the Devon Hills neighbor hood association has provided their comments.

Motion by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regard to the appeal at 1116 West Long Lake Road for an additional wall sign, non-illuminated, located on the west elevation, that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain a permit.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(8) 6160 Eastmoor Road – J. Hentschel
Mr. James Hentschel, homeowner, was present seeking approval for an 8 ft. encroachment into the required 25 ft. natural feature setback for the construction of a proposed driveway to accommodate a new garage addition, located 17 ft. from the water’s edge, Lot 100, The Braes of Bloomfield No. 1, Section 30. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-573 requires a 25-foot setback from the boundary or edge of a wetland. (19-0-451-013)

Mr. Hentschel addressed the Board with the request for an 8-foot encroachment in the natural feature setback for the construction of a proposed driveway to accommodate a new garage addition. Mr. Hentschel made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated not to have the garage doors face the street, but to have them face east to a wooded area. Mr. Hentschel stated this request resulted in the least loss of mature trees. Mr. Hentschel made mention the subdivision association comments have been provided.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regard to the appeal at 6160 Eastmoor Road to encroach 8-foot into the required 25-foot natural feature setback, that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(9) 2731 Turtle Shores Drive – Turtle Lake Development
Seeking approval for an existing accessory structure, a tiered boulder retaining wall with an overall height of approximately 8 ft., screened with existing trees and plantings, located in side and rear yards more than 16 ft. from the side and rear lot lines, Unit 77, Turtle Lake, Section 6. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any yard, except a rear yard, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-06-480-049)

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Taylor to move the item to the end of the agenda to allow for the petitioner to be present.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(10) 3395 Eastpointe Lane – Hasey Enterprise
Mr. Tom Kellett of Kellett Construction Company, was present seeking approval for an accessory structure to remain on site after the demolition of the home, an existing 2.1’ x 2.1’ x 5.8’ tall brick column with 5 ft. high gates attached to an existing column located in the road right-of-way, screened with existing tress and evergreen plantings, located in a front yard at the driveway entrance, Lot 10, Supervisor’s Plat No. 7, Section 8. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article I, Section 42-3 defines an accessory use/structure as a use, which is clearly incidental to, customarily found in connection with, and located on the same zoning lot as, the principal use to which it is related. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that all accessory structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-566 states that fences in a residential district must be located in a side or rear yard and shall not exceed 4 ft. in height. (19-08-476-001)

Mr. Kellett addressed the Board with the request for an accessory structure to remain on site after the demolition of the home, an existing brick column with 5-foot high gates attached to an existing column located in the road right-of-way. Mr. Kellett made reference to the photographs and indicated the existing screening of the brick columns. Mr. Kellett stated the columns and gates have existed for sixty years and would provide security to the lot and from the lake.

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regards to the appeal at 3395 Eastpointe Lane for an existing column, be approved as submitted, and the variance for an existing column and gate, located in a front yard, to remain after demolition of the home be granted. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must submit a Hold Harmless Affidavit to the Township.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(11) 5157 Wing Lake Road – S. Shammami
Mr. Ghassan Dalaly was present on behalf of his wife, seeking approval for an accessory structure, a partially installed 8.5’ x 8.5’ x 9.5’ high storage shed, screened with existing trees and plantings, located in a rear yard 9 ft. from the southerly side and rear lot lines, Lot 8, The Dells of Bloomfield, Section 20. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side or rear lot line, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-20-401-009)

Mr. Dalaly addressed the Board with the request for a partially installed storage shed, located in the rear yard, screened with existing trees and plantings. Mr. Dalaly made reference to the site plan and stated the southeast corner was chosen for it’s unique landscape with the existing evergreens and trees to help camouflage the proposed storage shed. Mr. Dalaly stated the storage shed would be utilized to store garden tools and lawn equipment, which would allow the use of the garage for vehicles.

Mr. Steven Vanker, resident at 5250 Kellen Lane, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.

Ms. Janet Chow, resident at 5175 Wing Lake Road, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.

Ms. Michelle Margosian, resident at 5374 Echo Road, and Vice President of The Dells of Bloomfield Homeowners Association, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request. Ms. Margosian stated the association prohibits sheds within The Dells of Bloomfield.

Mr. Aldrich questioned Mr. Vanker of the existing shed on his property.

Mr. Vanker replied when the home was purchased nineteen years ago, the shed was there.

Mr. Taylor questioned were the trees removed from the applicant’s property.

Mr. Vanker replied he was not sure however, it appears to be at the property line.

Mr. Dalaly replied the trees that were removed were dead and the others were thinned out where needed. Mr. Dalaly stated additional trees would be installed to screen the shed from view as indicated on the proposed site plan.

Ms. Reisinger commented the proposed shed would be visible from the street and would require 9-foot screening to be installed to screen the structure from view of the street.

Mr. Taylor questioned the Homeowner’s Association on how do they handle existing structures.

Ms. Margosian replied the Homeowner’s Association addresses existing structures as they are reported with follow-up and compliance with the restrictions are addressed. Ms. Margosian stated the Association would approve an attachment to the home vs. a stand-alone accessory structure in the yard.

Chairman Khederian suggested to the Board to table the item to allow for discussion between the Homeowner’s Association and the applicant to determine placement of the accessory structure and screening of the accessory structure.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Reisinger in regard to the appeal at 5157 Wing Lake Road for an existing shed located 9-feet from the southerly side and rear lot lines, that the variance be tabled to January 8th, 2008, to allow the Homeowner’s Association and the applicant to come to an agreement with the placement of the shed and the screening of the shed.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(12) 7456 Cathedral Drive – B. Segal
Mr. Bruce Segal, homeowner, was present seeking approval for the installation of an accessory structure, a proposed hot tub, screened with existing trees and proposed evergreen plantings, located in a rear yard 30 ft. from the southerly side lot line and more than 50 ft. from the rear lot line, Lot 296, Birmingham Farms Subdivision No. 2, Section 32. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-32-401-023)

Mr. Segal addressed the Board with the request for the installation of an above ground hot tub to be located in the rear yard. Mr. Segal made reference to the site plan and indicated additional evergreens were planted to screen the proposed hot tub from view. Mr. Segal
indicated the above ground hot tub would be located well within the setback requirements from the side and rear lot lines. Mr. Segal stated the comments from Birmingham Farms subdivision association has been submitted and the neighbors on both sides have approved the variance request.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to the appeal at 7456 Cathedral Drive for the installation of a hot tub, that the variance be approved as requested. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(13) 1965 West Bend Court – R. Kipp
Mr. Kevin Lees of Three C’s Landscaping, was present seeking approval for the construction of accessory structures, a proposed hot tub and a 13.5’ x 13.5’ x 11.8’ high gazebo, screened with existing trees and proposed plantings, located in a rear yard more than 16 ft. from the side and rear lot lines, Lot 56, Shorewood Hills, Section 7. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-07-352-004)

Mr. Lees addressed the Board with the request for a proposed cedar gazebo and a hot tub/spa. Mr. Lees made reference to the site plan and indicated the proposed location for the 13.5’ x 13.5’ x 11.8’ high gazebo in the rear yard would be screened with existing and proposed plantings. Mr. Lees indicated on the site plan the proposed above ground hot tub/spa to be placed on the patio area off of the new deck. Mr. Lees stated the proposed above ground hot tub/spa would be screened with existing and proposed plantings. Mr. Lees stated the comments from the Homeowners Association had been provided.

Ms. Seneker made mention of a letter received in support of the variance requests from Mr. David Freedman, resident at 2000 Westbend Court.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Seneker in regard to the appeal at 1965 West Bend Court for the installation of a hot tub and the construction of a gazebo be approved as submitted based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(14) 6790 Telegraph Road – Sunrise Development II
Ms. Jane Miles of Contemporary Sign and Design, was present seeking approval for the use of a proposed 5’ x 6’ (30 sq. ft.) temporary non-illuminated ground sign for approximately two years, located 15 ft. from the front lot line, Telegraph Road frontage, Lots 1 to 9, Birmingham Farms, Section 32. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV,
Section 42-568 states that a sign within the RM, Multiple-Family, zoned district, shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-32-277-030)

Ms. Miles addressed the Board with the request for a temporary non-illuminated ground sign to remain for approximately two (2) years. Ms. Miles stated the proposed ground sign would be for the announcement of coming soon Sunrise South, the new senior assisted living facility. Ms. Miles made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the temporary ground sign would be set back 15-feet from the property line along Telegraph Road. Ms. Miles stated the Township Design Review Board granted approval for the temporary ground sign on November 14th, 2007.

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regard to the appeal at 6790 Telegraph Road for the construction of a temporary ground sign, to remain on site until the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, that the request be approved as submitted based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards. Petitioner must obtain a permit.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(15) 4800 Burnley Drive – G. Woronowycz & D. Voronovich
Mr. George Woronowycz, homeowner, was present seeking approval for the use of existing accessory structures, two temporary 10’ x 20’ x 10’ high storage tents through June 2008, screened with existing trees, located in a rear yard 27 ft. from the northerly side lot line and 47 ft. from the rear lot line, Lot 81, Charing Cross Estates, Section 24. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-24-253-012)

Mr. Woronowycz addressed the Board with the request for the use of two (2) existing storage tents. Mr. Woronowycz made reference to the photographs and indicated the two (2) existing tents, located in the rear yard, screened with existing trees. Mr. Woronowycz stated the home is currently under construction, which involves a new addition with a basement and a new larger garage. Mr. Woronowycz commented the temporary storage sheds would be utilized to store household items and lawn equipment until June 2008, to allow for the construction to be completed on the home. Mr. Woronowycz submitted to the Board the comments from the subdivision association and the adjacent neighbors for the variance request.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Seneker in regard to the appeal at 4800 Burnley Drive for two (2) existing storage tents to remain on site through June 2008 or upon the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy which ever comes first, that the request be approved as submitted based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards. Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

(16) 6510-6676 Telegraph Road – Schostak Brothers
Mr. Bob Casazza, Regional Manager for Massage Envy, was present seeking approval for a variance of four (4) parking spaces for the inclusion of a massage parlor at Bloomfield Plaza Shopping Center, located at the southwest corner of Telegraph Road and Maple Road West. Also seeking approval for a 545 ft. encroachment into the required 750 ft. setback from an adjacent residential zoned district, which is located 205 ft. from the proposed massage parlor, a regulated use, Acreage Parcel, Section 32. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-576 states no regulated use may be located within 1,000 ft. of another regulated use; and no regulated use may be located within 750 ft. of any residential zoning district or other use, which is primarily oriented to youth (less than 18 years of age) activities. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-560 establishes that 27 spaces are required for this type of use, with only 23 spaces approved for this retail tenant space. (19-32-277-041)

Mr. Casazza addressed the Board with the request for four (4) additional parking spaces to allow for the inclusion of a new tenant Massage Envy clinic. Mr. Casazza stated the Massage Envy is a franchise for membership based massage therapy clinics. Mr. Casazza indicated there are over 270 Massage Envy clinics presently in operation in 30 states with several under development. Mr. Casazza stated the revenue from the clinics is generated through monthly dues of members and walk-in non-member customers who come in for massage therapy. Mr. Casazza indicated trained therapists and who meet stringent Massage Envy corporate standards administer the massage therapy to the members. Mr. Casazza addressed the four (4) additional parking spaces to the Board with a detailed spreadsheet and stated the parking at Bloomfield Plaza is deficient. Mr. Casazza made reference to The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-576 states no regulated use may be located within 1,000 feet of another regulated use; and no regulated use may be located within 750 feet of any residential zoning district or other use which is primarily oriented to youth (less than 18 years of age) activities. Mr. Casazza indicated on the site plan as it relates to the zoning requirements that the site chosen is approximately 360-feet from a residential neighborhood.
Mr. Casazza commented this proposed site at Bloomfield Plaza, which is facing Telegraph Road, is a prime location for Massage Envy based on the demographics of the area.

Mr. Taylor questioned are the massage therapists licensed by the State.

Mr. Casazza replied the State of Michigan does not require the massage therapist to be licensed however Massage Envy requires a standard minimum of 500 hours requirement/experience prior to employment.

Chairman Khederian questioned how many clients would be serviced at this facility.

Mr. Casazza replied fifteen (15) therapy rooms and a waiting area with a possibility of twenty-five (25) clients plus the twenty (20) staff members. Mr. Casazza stated the business hours of the proposed clinic would be 8:00 AM to 10:00 PM Monday – Friday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM Saturday, and 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM Sunday. Mr. Casazza commented the peak hours for the clinic would be during the evening hours.

Chairman Khederian addressed the letter submitted from Township Fire Marshal, Mike McCully, and stated the Fire Department is not in favor of granting a variance of the parking ordinance as it relates to the above address. In 2006 parking in the plaza was reduced from 1368 spaces to 967 spaces represents a 27% reduction from the number of spaces required by ordinance. Allowing more business into the shopping center would only add to the current problem and may reduce our ability to properly provide emergency services.

Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building, replied to the Board and commented to the Fire Marshal’s letter. Ms. McCullough stated the intent of the letter was to address the retail use along with the traffic pattern and flow. Ms. McCullough stated the proposed use is more an intensive use than what was previously there.

Mr. Richard Moxley, homeowner at 3851 Carriage Road, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request and commented the neighbors may have objections to this particular use and stated this could be a public issue.

Mr. Taylor stated the neighbors are notified within 500-feet from the petitioners address and commented no letters were submitted in opposition for the variance request.

Mr. Casazza replied given the parking study of the shopping center performed the center is 576 parking spaces deficient. Mr. Casazza stated the variance request is for four (4) additional parking spaces with business peak hours being after 5:00 PM.

Chairman Khederian questioned the need for the 545-foot encroachment into the required 750-foot setback from an adjacent residential zoned district.

Mr. Casazza replied the 545-foot encroachment is needed for the site to be highly visible from the main road.

Mr. Buckley questioned is Massage Envy a franchise or corporate owned.

Mr. Casazza replied Massage Envy is a franchise with developments under way in Rochester Hills, West Bloomfield and Grosse Pointe.

Mr. Buckley questioned if the interior rooms were reduced, would the parking variance request be less. Mr. Buckley questioned licensing the business.

Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building, stated a local business license is not required by Bloomfield Township. Ms. McCullough commented the business would operate under the terms of the Bloomfield Township Ordinances.

Mr. Kepes suggested instead of reducing the number of rooms, to reduce the room size to allow for storage space to be utilized therefore the need for retail has been decreased.

Ms. McCullough replied the site plan was reviewed as retail to a salon orientation.

Mr. Kepes suggested to the Board to deny the parking variance and allow the tenant and landlord to work out the situation for the parking. Mr. Kepes questioned the zoning requirements and the definition for a massage parlor, which includes other entities.

Ms. Patti McCullough replied as requested before the Board is a floor plan as presented indicating rooms to provide massage. Ms. McCullough stated should there be a finding that there are other activities occurring they would be required to return to the Board.

Mr. Casazza reiterated to the Board that the Sate of Michigan does not issue licensing for massage therapy; the reduction in massage rooms would be costly for the tenant as well as the landlord; and Massage Envy is for massage therapy only and is located in high end districts.

Mr. Buckley suggested the landlord, Schostak Brothers, provide their comments as it relates to the variance requests.

Ms. Seneker questioned has other Township Board’s reviewed the variance requests.

Ms. Patti McCullough replied no other Township Board has reviewed this request.

Motion by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Mr. Kepes in regard to the appeal at 6510-6676 Telegraph Road for a variance of four (4) parking spaces for the inclusion of a massage parlor, at Bloomfield Plaza. Also seeking approval for a 545-foot encroachment into the required 750-foot setback for a regulated use located 205-feet from the adjacent residential zoned district, that the variances be tabled to January 8th, 2008 to allow the petitioner to consider eliminating the parking variance of four (4) spaces.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

Chairman Khederian addressed item (9) to be heard.

No one was present.

(9) 2731 Turtle Shores Drive – Turtle Lake Development
Ms. Patti McCullough, Planning and Building Director, addressed the Board for approval for an existing accessory structure, a tiered boulder retaining wall with an overall height of approximately 8 ft., screened with existing trees and plantings, located in side and rear yards more than 16 ft. from the side and rear lot lines, Unit 77, Turtle Lake, Section 6. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any yard, except a rear yard, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, that such vegetation shall be maintained in a healthy condition, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. (19-06-480-049)

Ms. McCullough made reference to the site plan and indicated the existing tiered boulder wall with an overall height of 8-feet, located in the side and rear yards, screened with existing trees and plantings. Ms. McCullough stated subdivision association comments have been submitted.

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regard to the appeal at 2731 Turtle Shores Drive for an existing retaining wall, that the request be approved as submitted, and the variance for an existing retaining wall located in a side yard be granted. Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty. Petitioner must submit a final grade certification within five (5) business days.

Motion carried, 7 – 0.

 

IV. GENERAL BUSINESS

a. Next Board Meeting – January 8th, 2008

V. ADJOURNMENT

Respectfully submitted,

Patricia McCullough, Director
Planning and Building Department

kd

> THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPROVALS SHALL BE VALID FOR A PERIOD NO LONGER THAN ONE YEAR UNLESS A BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED.

> IN THE EVENT THAT AN APPEAL IS APPROVED, CONTINGENT UPON THE SUBMITTAL OF AN AFFIDAVIT, PLEASE ALLOW UP TO FOURTEEN (14) BUSINESS DAYS TO PROCESS THE DOCUMENT.

> APPROVED MINUTES WILL BE AVAILABLE ON LINE AND AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFTER THE NEXT SCHEDULED BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING.

 

 

 

Home  |  Government  |  Services  |  Community  |  Current Events  |  Resources
Contact Us  |  E-mail List  |  Forms

Still can't find what you're looking for?
Use our comprehensive Search or Site Map pages!

Charter Township of Bloomfield
4200 Telegraph Road
P.O. Box 489
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303-0489
248.433.7700

Click here to report website technical issues.
Need to contact the webmaster?  Click here.

This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher and Netscape 6.0 or higher.

Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Having trouble accessing our site forms? Your browser may not have the Acrobat Reader plug-in that is required.  Click here to download a free copy of this software.

Site Design/Development by
Bringing the World to Your Corner of the World

 

Proudly serving our community online since 1999.
Named #1 Township Website in Michigan by Cyber-state.org

Site Use Policy

All information © 2008 Bloomfield Township, Michigan 

 

Current Agendas
Latest Minutes

 
New Township Office Hours

 
Tax and Water Bill Payments

 
Pay your Rizzo bill online

 
Parcel/Property Taxpayer Info

 
Current Newsletter - Summer 2008 This document is available to view in PDF format.


 
Township Open House cancelled due to construction.

 
Household Hazardous Waste Day

 
August 5 Election Results

 
Lawn Care for Lakes Seminar

 
Township Gateway Sign Installed

 
Safety Path Millage Renewal

 
2007 Township Annual Report This document is available to view in PDF format.
2007 Water Report
Digital TV Transition

 
Capital Improvement Program