Contact Us
E-Mail List
Forms

Home Government Services Community Current Events Resources
Bloomfield Government
Current Events Overview
Township Annual Report
Administration
Agendas
Budget
Capital Improvement Program
Directory
Employment Opportunities
History Records
Links
Millage Renewals
Minutes
Ordinances and Resolutions
Organization Chart
Other Officials
Polling Locations and Precincts
Public Meetings
Trustees
Site Map

 

 
Advanced Search Options

 

Government > Minutes

Overview  |  Board of Trustees  |  Planning Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA
Tuesday, August 14th, 2007 – 7:00 P.M. 
Bloomfield Township Hall

Welcome to the Bloomfield Township Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of August 14th, 2007.

As a brief introduction –  The Zoning Board of Appeals is a seven member, quasi-judicial body appointed by the Bloomfield Township Board of Trustees.  It is established and regulated by the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act and the Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield for questions arising under the Zoning Provisions of the Township. Matters pending before the Zoning Board of Appeals are decided on a case-by-case basis.

The Zoning Board is empowered to:  1. Grant variances to the Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, 2. Approve accessory structures, and 3. Interpret the Zoning Ordinance.

Any appeal of a decision made by the Zoning Board of Appeals is subject to Circuit Court Review.

Each case will be called separately, in the order shown on tonight's agenda.  There will be an opportunity for public comment at one point during each case. All persons wishing to address the Board will be asked to provide their name and address at the podium. Given the number of appeals tonight, please make your comments brief. You are encouraged to address the Board, but if you do so, please address your comments to me, the Chairperson, and not the applicant or other members of the public. 

Comments by the Neighborhood Association will be considered as part of the factual information presented to the Board, but it is not the determining factor for approval or denial.  Please confine comments to the specific request before the Board.  

For a request to be successful, an affirmative vote of at least four members present is required.  A tie will result in the applicant being denied their request.

We hope this helps provide a better understanding of what you can expect at tonight's meeting. Thank you. We’ll now call the first case.

I.      ATTENDANCE:

PRESENT:  James Aldrich, David Buckley, Jane Reisinger, Carol Rosati, Robert Taylor, and Chairman Corinne Khederian. 

ABSENT:  Brian Henry, Brian Kepes, Lisa Seneker    

Chairman Khederian addressed the audience and indicated item (2T) 7297 Kingswood Drive, was removed at the petitioner’s request.  Chairman Khederian made mention of property 4476 W. Maple and indicated this item would be placed on a future agenda.

II.      APPROVAL OF MINUTES

a.      Approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes of July 10th, 2007

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Mr. Buckley to approve the Zoning Board of Appeals minutes of July 10th, 2007, as written.

Motion carried,  6 – 0. 

III. APPEALS

Tabled Items

(1T)  821 Highwood Drive – M. Nasrollahzadeh

Mr. Narollahzadeh, homeowner, was present seeking approval for the construction of a proposed accessory structure, a 12’ x 12’ x 17.9’ high pergola, located in a front yard on a proposed terrace 50 ft. from the rear property line and 101.6 ft. from the front property line, Rayburn Road frontage, on Lot 103, Eastover Farms No. 1, Section 13.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall not exceed fourteen (14) ft. in height, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-13-126-005)

Mr. Nasrollahzadeh addressed the Board with a request for a proposed pergola to be located on a proposed terrace in the front yard of Rayburn Road frontage.  Mr. Nasrollahzadeh made reference to the drawing and asked the Board for an amendment to the height of the proposed pergola to be 14-feet high instead of 17.9-feet high as originally requested.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regard to the appeal at 821 Highwood Drive for the construction of a pergola as amended, that the request be approved as submitted, and the variance for the front yard location be granted.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried,  6 – 0.    

(2T)  Item removed at the request of the petitioner.

Seeking approval to expand an existing accessory structure, a 3.3 ft. to 4.8 ft. high retaining wall screened with existing and proposed plantings, located in a rear yard within the required 16 ft. northerly side yard setback on Lot 64, Franklin Woods Manor No. 2, Section 31.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-558 states that non-conformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side lot line, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  7297 Kingswood Drive  (19-31-451-008)

New Items

(1)  6336 Thurber Road – M. Schlegel

Mr. Matthew Schlegel, homeowner, was present seeking approval for a 4 ft. encroachment into the required 16 ft. side yard setback for the installation of a proposed air-conditioning unit screened with proposed plantings, located 12 ft. from the southerly side lot line on Lots 210 and 211, Wing Lake Shore, Section 29.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that ground mounted mechanical and electrical equipment shall not be located in the required 16 ft. side yard setback and shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year.  (19-29-381-006) 

Mr. Schlegel addressed the Board with the request for a 4-foot encroachment into the side yard setback for the installation of a proposed air-conditioning unit screened with proposed plantings.  Mr. Schlegel made reference to the proposed location and indicated the proposed air-conditioning unit would be placed 12-feet from the southerly lot line and 4-feet from the side yard setback, screened with proposed plantings.     

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the letter received signed by the neighbors and the comments from the subdivision association.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regard to the appeal at 6336 Thurber Road for a 4-foot encroachment into the required 16-foot side yard setback for the installation of an air-conditioning unit, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must provide revised site plans to the Building Department for the pool and air-conditioning unit location within five (5) business days.

Motion carried,  6 – 0.

(2)  334 Glenhurst Drive North – Glenhurst Homes, LLC

Mr. Lewis Lockwood of Glenhurst Homes, LLC, was present seeking approval for a 1.7 ft. encroachment into the required 16 ft. side yard setback for existing accessory structures, two air-conditioning units screened from view with existing evergreen plantings, located in a side yard 14.3 ft. from the southerly side lot line, Lot 737 and Part of Lot 738, Judson Bradway’s Bloomfield Village No. 3, Section 26.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559, states that ground-mounted mechanical or electrical equipment shall not be located in the required 16 ft. side yard setback.  (19-26-378-005)

Mr. Lockwood addressed the Board with a 1.7-foot encroachment into the side yard setback for two (2) existing air-conditioning units screened from view with evergreen plantings.  Mr. Lockwood made reference to the site plan and indicated the notch in the building foundation, which would be the location of the two (2) air-conditioning units.  Mr. Lockwood stated after the final as-built survey was completed it was determined that the two (2) air-conditioners would still encroach into the side yard setback by 1.7-feet.  Mr. Lockwood made reference to the design of the home, which includes a rear entry garage with driveway, a patio to service the back french doors, and a full height bow window.  Mr. Lockwood made reference to the photographs and stated the two (2) existing air-conditioning units are currently screened with eight (8) 3’6” high arborvitaes.     

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the comments received from Judson Bradway’s Bloomfield Village for the variance request.

Motion by Ms. Rosati, Seconded by Mr. Taylor in regard to the appeal at 334 Glenhurst Drive North for a 1.7-foot encroachment into the required 16-foot side yard setback for two (2) existing air-conditioning units that the request be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must submit a permit application with five (5) business days and a site plan prior to final inspection.

Motion carried,  6 – 0.  

(3)  5192 Iron Gate Road – H. York

Mr. Philip Kurzyniec of KSJ Construction along with Mr. Hayward York, homeowner, were present seeking approval for a 19.6 ft. encroachment into the required 40 ft. front yard setback for the construction of a proposed single story addition to the existing non-conforming building, located 20.4 ft. from the front lot line, Kensington Road frontage, Lot 83, Nantucket Green, Section 24.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-558 states that non-conformities shall not be enlarged upon expanded or extended.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III, Section 42-527, requires a minimum of 40 ft. in the front yard setback.  (19-24-402-012)

Mr. Kurzyniec addressed the Board with the request for a 19.6-foot encroachment into the front yard setback for the construction of a proposed single story addition to the existing residence.  Mr. Kurzyniec stated the use for the addition would be for storage of lawn equipment and the proposed material for the addition would match the existing residence. 

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the comments received from the subdivision association for the variance request.

Mr. York, homeowner, was present and stated he had six (6) signatures of approval from the neighbors within 300-feet of the residence.

Motion by Mr. Buckley, Seconded by Ms. Rosati in regard to the appeal at 5192 Iron Gate Road for a 19.6-foot encroachment into the required 40-foot front yard setback for the construction of an addition to the existing non-conforming building, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.    

Motion carried,  6 – 0.

(4) 6250 Worlington Road – F. Khaja

Mr. Brian Halprin of Brain J. Halprin Architect, LLC, was present on behalf of the homeowners seeking approval for a 5 ft. encroachment into the required 40 ft. front yard setback for the construction of a proposed single-story porch addition, located 35 ft. from the front lot line.  Also seeking approval for a 9 ft. encroachment into the required 16 ft. side yard setback to reconstruct the single-story attached garage to the existing non-conforming home, located 7 ft. from the southerly side lot line.  Part of Lot 84 and all of Lots 85 and 86, Wing Lake Shores, Section 29.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-558, states that non-conformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III, Section 42-527 requires a minimum of 40 ft. in the front yard setback and a minimum of 16 ft. in the side yard setback.  (19-29-451-008)

Mr. Halprin addressed the Board with a request for a 5-foot encroachment into the front yard setback for the construction of a proposed single-story porch addition.  Mr. Halprin also addressed a 9-foot encroachment into the side yard setback to reconstruct the single-story attached garage to the existing non-conforming home.  Mr. Halprin made reference to the proposed drawings and site plan and indicated the request would be to rebuild the existing garage at the existing foundations with a storage truss above accessed by permanent steps in the garage.  Mr. Halprin stated the proposed addition would allow for a new mudroom, kitchen and family room, dining and living room and a new front covered porch.  Mr. Halprin presented the Board with the comments from the subdivision association and four (4) adjacent neighbors approving of the variances. Mr. Halprin indicated Mr. Paul Reason, resident at 6266 Worlington Road, Ms. Barbara Woolf, resident at 6236 Worlington Road, Mr. Daniel Edwards, resident at 6265 Worlington Road, and Ms. Ann McGovern, resident at 6245 Worlington Road signed and approved the proposed building elevations.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regards to the appeal at 6250 Worlington Road for a 5-foot encroachment into the front yard setback and a 9-foot encroachment into the side yard setback for the construction of an addition for the existing non-conforming home, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.      

Motion carried,  6 – 0.

(5)  1539 Bartley Lane – R. Doshi

Mr. Rajesh Doshi, homeowner, was present seeking approval for a 19 ft. encroachment into the required 35 ft. rear yard setback for the construction of a proposed deck to the existing non-conforming building, located 16 ft. from the rear lot line and 18 ft. from the northerly side lot line, Unit 12, English Meadows of Bloomfield, Section 2.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-558, states that non-conformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III, Section 42-527, requires a minimum of 35 ft. in the rear yard set back.  (19-02-102-031)

Mr. Doshi addressed the Board with the request for a 12-foot encroachment into the rear yard setback for the construction of a proposed deck.  Mr. Doshi asked the Board for an amendment to the variance request from 19-feet to 12-feet encroachment into the rear yard setback.

Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building, stated the amendment as shown was found upon review of the as-built plan submitted for the construction of the new home did comply with the 35-foot rear yard setback.  Ms. McCullough stated the dimension offered by the petitioner for the variance request was incorrect.  Ms. McCullough made reference to the amended site plan and indicated to the Board the petitioner is seeking approval for a 12-foot encroachment into the 35-foot rear yard setback for the construction of a proposed deck to be located 23-feet from the rear lot line.  Ms. McCullough stated the encroachment requested is less than what was noticed.

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the comments received from the subdivision association.                    

Mr. Vabilisettis Murty, homeowner at 1542 Threadneedle, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.

Mr. Buckley suggested installing a landscape buffer between the lot lines to help with screening the deck from view of the adjacent neighbors.

Ms. Reisinger suggested to the Board to table the variance request until a landscape plan for the rear yard has been provided and reviewed.

Mr. Taylor made reference to the aerial photograph provided and indicated the residence at 1542 Threadneedle with a deck appears to be closer to the lot line than what is being proposed for 1539 Bartley Lane.     

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich in regards to the appeal at 1539 Bartley Lane for a 12-foot encroachment as amended into the required 35-foot rear yard setback for a deck for the existing non-conforming building, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried,  4 – 2.

YEAS:  Taylor, Aldrich, Reisinger, Khederian

NAYS:  Buckley, Rosati

(6)  3749 Darlington Road South – M. Pulte

Mr. James Hedemark, construction manager, along with Ms. Julie Pulte, homeowner, were present seeking approval for the construction of a proposed accessory use/structure, an in-ground pool, screened with existing trees and proposed plantings, located in a rear yard 20 ft. from the wall of the building, 3.3 ft. from the rear lot line and more than 16 ft. from the side lot lines, Lot 5, Oaks of Bloomfield, Section 28.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559, states that accessory use/structures shall not be located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side or rear lot line and shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year.  (19-28-276-025)

Mr. Hedemark addressed the Board with the request to install an in-ground swimming pool in the rear yard to be screened with existing trees and proposed plantings.  Mr. Hedemark made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the two conditions that impact the placement of the proposed swimming pool.  Mr. Hedemark indicated the first condition is the existing 12-foot utility easement over the middle of the yard.  Mr. Hedemark stated having the utilities relocated is out of the question for financial reasons.  Mr. Hedemark indicated the second condition is the Township’s 16-foot rear yard setback requirement.  Mr. Hedemark stated the home backs up to the golf course, with additional evergreen landscaping and fencing being installed to the east and west property lines which would screen the side neighbors from view.  Mr. Hedemark indicated the fencing would have self-latching and locking gates with an automated safety pool cover that would meet building code.

 Mr. Taylor asked for clarification of the proposed location for the swimming pool and the existing overhead utility easement.

Mr. Hedemark made reference on the site plan and indicated the utility easement and the proposed location of the swimming pool. 

 Ms. Pulte addressed the Board and indicated DTE quoted her a price of $480,00.00 to bury the utility line, and indicated this quote included four (4) other neighbors that would have to bury their lines, given this is a main line.   

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the letter submitted from Oakland Hills Country Club which indicated a “no contest” opinion given no landscape plan has been submitted for their review.

Ms. Reisinger made mention of a letter received in support of the variance request from Ms. Jeannie Comb, resident at 3741 S. Darlington Road, and Mr. John Berg, resident at 3761 S. Darlington Road.

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the comments provided for the variance request from the Oaks of Bloomfield Property Owners Association.  

Mr. Taylor questioned the placement of the pool equipment.

Mr. Hedemark made reference to the site plan and indicated the pool equipment would be placed on the brick paver patio, in the rear yard adjacent to the residential wall.

Motion by Ms. Rosati, Seconded by Ms. Reisinger in regard to the appeal at 3749 Darlington Road South for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool located 3.3-feet from the rear lot line, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Given the utility lines run through the rear yard.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried,  6 – 0.

Ms. Rosati recused herself from the next item by indicating she resides within the Township’s notification area.

(7)  1315 Lone Pine Road – R. Glisky

Seeking approval for the construction of a proposed 6 ft. high cedar fence over a 4 ft. high existing concrete wall, having an overall height of 10 ft. screened with proposed plantings, located in a rear yard 4 ft. from the westerly side lot line and 12 ft. from the southerly rear lot line, Lot 23, The Dells of Bloomfield, Section 20.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be located closer than 16 ft. to any side or rear lot line, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-566 states fences in a residential district shall not exceed 4 ft. in height.  (19-20-403-003)

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich to move item (7) 1315 Lone Pine to the end of the agenda to allow the petitioner to be present.

Motion carried,  5 – 0 – 1.

YEAS:  Reisinger, Aldrich, Buckley, Taylor, Khederian 

NAYS:  None

ABSTAINED:  Rosati

(8)  1500 Kirkway Road – T. Ravikant

Mr. Lou DesRosiers of DesRosiers Architects, was present seeking approval to encroach 50 ft. into the lakeside setback with the required average setback of the neighboring properties at 143.94 ft. for the construction of a new home, Lot 1, West Lochslea, Section 8.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article III, Section 42-527 requires new construction to be set back from the waterfront the average of the setback of the principal buildings on the nearest improved waterfront lots within 500 ft. of each side of the lot in question, and in no instance shall a setback in excess of 100 ft. be required.  (19-08-352-010)

Mr. DesRosiers addressed the Board with the request to encroach 50-feet into the lakeside setback for the construction of a new home.  Mr. DesRosiers presented a revised scaled down rendering of the proposed home to be located on the property.  Mr. DesRosiers made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the revised building plans propose a smaller home, by the width of the new design being 32-feet shorter than the previously approved design, increasing the western side yard from 25-feet to 53-feet and increases the eastern side yard by 4-feet.  Mr. DesRosiers stated the proposed home would be setback 50-feet from the lakeside setback.

Ms. Rosati questioned the average setback within the neighboring properties.

Mr. DesRosiers replied the average setback of the neighboring properties is 143.94-feet.

Chairman Khederian made mention of the comments received from Island, Lower Long and Forest Lake Property Owners Association.

Chairman Khederian made mention of two (2) letters received in support of the variance request from Mr. Anthony Hopp, resident at 1474 Inwoods Circle, and Mr. Gerhardt Knodel, resident at 1522 Kirkway Road.

Chairman Khederian made mention of a letter received in opposition of the variance request from Dr. and Mrs. Hans Schwarz, residents at 1448 Inwoods Circle Court.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Ms. Reisinger in regard to the appeal at 1500 Kirkway Road for a 50-foot encroachment into the lakeside setback for the construction of a new home, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried,  6 – 0.

 (9)  1333 Glengarry Road North – D. Victor

Mr. Keith Schmaltz of Environmental Artist, was present seeking approval for the construction of proposed accessory structures, a 10’ x 3.5’ x 11.8’ high gas fireplace screened with existing trees, located in a side yard 59.6’ from the southerly side lot line and 193.3 ft. from the rear lot line.  Also seeking approval to increase the height of an existing block retaining wall by an additional 2.7 ft. for a total of 6.7 ft., located in a side yard more than 16 ft. from the side and rear lot lines, Lot 638, Judson Bradway’s Bloomfield Village No. 2, Section 27.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559, states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-27-202-019)

Mr. Schmaltz addressed the Board with the request for an outdoor gas fireplace, and to raise an existing retaining wall that would form a walkout area directly behind the house.  Mr. Schmaltz made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the existing retaining wall would require an additional 2.7-feet to be added onto which would extend across the rear and side yard that would end with the proposed outdoor fireplace.

Ms. Reisinger made mention of the comments received for the variance request from Judson Bradway’s Bloomfield Village.

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regards to the appeal at 1333 Glengarry Road North for the construction of a fireplace and increase in height of an existing retaining wall, that the request be approved as submitted, and the variance for the increase in height of an existing retaining wall with an overall height of 6.7-feet located in a side yard be granted.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits. 

 Motion carried,  6 – 0.     

  (10)  320 Berkshire Drive North – M. Shapiro

Mr. Mark Shapiro, homeowner, was present seeking approval for the construction of a proposed accessory structure, a 12’ x 16’ x 10.3’ high shed with electrical service, screened with existing trees and proposed plantings, located in a rear yard 20 ft. from the northerly side lot line and 150 ft. from the westerly rear lot line, Lot 22, Bloomfield Highlands Subdivision, Section 4.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559, states that accessory structures shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-04-376-003)

 Mr. Shapiro addressed the Board with the request to construct a 12’x16’x10.3’ high shed to be located in the rear yard, screened with existing and proposed plantings.  Mr. Shapiro stated the proposed shed would be utilized to store lawn and gardening equipment.  Mr. Shapiro submitted subdivision comments to the Board along with the approval from Mr. Todd Wethy, resident at 125 N. Berkshire Avenue.  Mr. Shapiro stated the electrical utility would provide service for lighting within the proposed shed.

 Ms. Carleen VanVoorhies, resident at 365 N. Berkshire, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.

 Mr. Shapiro replied the proposed shed would not be visible from the street given the slope of the driveway.  Mr. Shapiro stated they intent to plant around the proposed shed in a manner consistent with the rest of the property.

 Mr. Taylor questioned which way would the door face on the proposed shed.

 Mr. Shapiro replied the door on the proposed shed would face the existing driveway.

 Mr. Taylor suggested landscaping be installed to soften the view of the proposed shed.

 Mr. Shapiro replied flowers and arborvitaes could be installed to help soften the view, however, the flowers and arborvitaes would not screen the door.

 Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Ms. Rosati in regard to the appeal at 320 Berkshire Drive North for the construction of a shed, that the request be approved as submitted based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits. 

 Motion carried,  4 –2.

YEAS:  Reisinger, Rosati, Aldrich, Buckley

NAYS:  Taylor, Khederian

 (11)  2386 Tilbury Place – A. Likly

Mr. Paul Boomer of Kittyhawk Construction, was present seeking approval for the construction of a proposed accessory use/structure, a 6’ x 1’ x 14’ high fireplace attached to the existing non-conforming building, located in a rear yard 17.8 ft. from the northerly side lot line and 35 ft. from the easterly side lot line.  Also seeking approval to change a portion of the rear roof from a hip line to a gable, Lot 231, Judson Bradway’s Bloomfield Village, Section 26.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-558 states that non-conformities shall not be enlarged upon, expanded, or extended.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559, states that accessory use/structures shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-26-352-012)

 Mr. Boomer addressed the Board with a request to construct a 6’ x 1’ x 14’ high fireplace to be attached to the existing residence, located in the rear yard.  Mr. Boomer made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the location of the gas sealed fireplace and stated a portion of the rear roof would be changed from a hip line to a gabled roof.  Mr. Boomer indicated by placing the fireplace on the back wall of the existing room, it effectively would change the orientation of the back yard living place to the side yard.  Mr. Boomer stated the subdivision association comments have been provided to the Board for the variance request.

 Chairman Khederian made mention of the letter received in support of the variance request from Mr. & Mrs. Larry Nutson, residents at 2386 Tilbury Place.      

 Mr. Jerome Kempf, resident at 2364 Tilbury Place, was present and spoke in support of the variance request.

 Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Ms. Rosati in regard to the appeal at 2386 Tilbury Place for the construction of an attached fireplace, that the request be approved as submitted, and the variance to change the roofline of the existing non-conforming building from hip line to gabled roof, be granted.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

 Motion carried,  6 – 0.

 (12)  3820 & 3830 Burning Tree – D. Hoeft & R. Meloeny

Mr. Brian Najor resident at 3710 Burning Tree, and member of Still Meadow Homeowners Association, was present seeking approval for the construction of proposed accessory structures, two 14’ x 2’ x 5’ high entranceway structures identifying Still Meadow’s Subdivision, screened with existing trees, located in front yards .9 ft. from the lot line in the in the southeasterly and the southwesterly corners of Acreage Parcels, Section 16.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-569 requires any subdivision entranceway structure, which includes letters or graphics, to be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-16-276-018 and 19-16-278-018)

 Mr. Najor addressed the Board with the request to construct two (2) subdivision entranceway signs at the intersection of Thornbrier Way and Long Lake Road, screened with existing trees.  Mr. Najor made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the signs would be 14’ x 2’ x 5’ high identifying Still Meadow’s subdivision, constructed of stone pillars with limestone caps with a brick wall between them.        

 Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building, made mention of the request being heard at the Design Review Board meeting on July 25th, 2007, which was forwarded onto the Zoning Board of Appeals.

 Motion by Ms. Rosati, Seconded by Mr. Buckley for the appeal at 3820 and 3830 Burning Tree for the construction of two (2) entranceway structures, that the request be approved as submitted based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits. 

 Motion carried,  6 – 0.

(13)  1765 Telegraph Road – Car CNI-2, L.P./Smart Car 

Mr. Al Paas of DesRosiers Architects, was present seeking approval for additional signage, a proposed 13.2’ x 2.6’ (34.3 sq. ft.) permanent secondary wall sign with a 2.8’ x 2.6’ (7.3 sq. ft.) logo, exceeding the maximum allowable area for a logo by 5.6 sq. ft., located on the southeasterly façade facing the parking area (1.2 % of the southeasterly façade), in addition to a 30’ x 1’ (30 sq. ft.) wall sign, located on the southerly façade facing Telegraph Road (which is 3.1% of the southerly façade).  The total sign area of the two signs combined is 64 sq. ft., Acreage Parcel, Section 6.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-568, allows one wall or ground sign within the B-3 (General Business) zoned district, states that in no instance shall the wall sign size exceed one hundred twenty (120) square feet in area, and that wall signs shall be authorized to contain numbers and letters combined in their customary form and in addition shall be entitled to contain figures (illustrations) provided that all figures shall not constitute more than five (5) percent of the total sign area.  (19-06-226-004) 

Mr. Paas addressed the Board with a 2-part variance request for additional signage, a 13.2’ x 2.6’ (34.3 square feet) permanent secondary wall sign with a 2.8’ x 2.6’ Smart Car logo to be placed on the southeasterly façade facing the parking lot.  Mr. Paas referred to the proposed site plan and indicated the 30’ x 1’ (30 square feet) wall sign, “Smart Center Bloomfield” to be placed on the southerly façade facing Telegraph Road.  Mr. Paas stated the Design Review Board granted approval on June 20th, 2007, which was forwarded onto the Zoning Board of Appeals.   

 Ms. Reisinger questioned the request for wall signs vs. a ground sign for this site.

 Mr. Paas replied the wall signs as proposed for this site would be complementary to the building and a ground sign would not be requested.

 Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Ms. Reisinger in regard to the appeal at 1765 Telegraph Road for a 34.4 square foot secondary permanent wall sign with a 7.3 square foot logo, that the variance be approved as requested.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate to the Board’s satisfaction all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

 Motion carried,  6 – 0.            

(14)  6790, 6800, & 6810 Telegraph Road – Sunrise Development

Mr. Adam Gut of Frank Rewold and Son, was present seeking approval for the following to allow for the development of the proposed Sunrise Bloomfield II, Lots 1 to 9, Birmingham Farms, Section 32:

  • The installation of a proposed 24’ x 44’ x 13.9’ high temporary skirted office trailer to include handicap ramps and utilities screened with proposed plantings, located in front yards for eight months, Telegraph Road and Sandalwood Drive frontages.
  • The installation of a proposed 12’ x 60’ x 13’5’ high temporary skirted construction trailer to include utilities screened with proposed plantings, located in front yards for the duration of the project, Telegraph Road and Sandalwood Drive frontages.
  • To allow the existing 6 ft. high wood fencing, located in the front and rear yards along the westerly lot line, to remain after demolition of the existing structure until the installation of the permanent 6 ft. high masonry screen wall is built.
  • The installation of three construction/refuse dumpsters to remain on site for the duration of the project.
  • The installation of two 40 ft. steel storage containers to remain on site for a period of nine months.

The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article I, Section 42-3 defines accessory use/structure as a use, which is clearly incidental to, customarily found in connection with, and located on the same zoning lot as, the principal use to which it is related. The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-566 states that fences in a residential district must be located in a side or rear yard and shall not exceed 4 ft. in height.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article II, Section 42-564 states that open storage shall be specifically prohibited on all residential lots except as otherwise permitted by the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-32-277-030)

 Mr. Gut addressed the Board with a five-part variance request.  Mr. Gut made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the first structure to be utilized as a marketing office a 24’ x 44’ x 13.9’ high skirted trailer screened with proposed plantings to include handicap ramps with temporary electrical, water and sewer utilities.  Mr. Gut stated the proposed temporary parking lot would accommodate prospective Sunrise tenants away from the construction area and heavy traffic.  Mr. Gut stated the marketing trailer would be on site for eight (8) months indicating the project duration would be twelve-thirteen (12-13) months.  Mr. Gut commented if the project begins in October 2007 the marketing trailer would be on site beginning April 2008, with removal of the trailer in November 2008.  Mr. Gut addressed the installation of the proposed 12’ x 16’ x 13.5’ high temporary skirted trailer screened with proposed plantings to be utilized as a construction office for the site superintendent and field personnel to conduct meetings with subcontractors or suppliers.  Mr. Gut stated the proposed trailer would have electrical utilities.  Mr. Gut made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the construction trailer would be onsite for the duration of the project.  Mr. Gut referred to the proposed site plan and indicated the 6-foot high wood fence that exists along the west property line would remain until they are ready to install the permanent 6-foot high masonry screen wall.  Mr. Gut stated as the masonry screen wall is constructed, a temporary 6-foot high fence would be erected to screen the construction activity from Sandalwood Drive, specifically the home at 6856 Sandalwood Drive.  Mr. Gut addressed the Board and asked for three (3) construction/refuse dumpsters to be utilized and moved around on site during the duration of the project.  Mr. Gut addressed the last variance and requested two (2) 40-foot steel storage containers to be utilized on site during the construction project and remain on site for a period of nine months.

 Ms. Reisinger questioned the location of the proposed dumpsters and the storage containers for the development of the proposed Sunrise Bloomfield II.

 Mr. Gut replied the proposed dumpsters would be mobile on the site during construction.  Mr. Gut stated the storage containers would be placed on site once the new building has been partially constructed.  Mr. Gut stated the storage containers would be placed in close proximity to the new building and would be utilized to hold construction materials.

 Chairman Khederian addressed her concerns to the Board and indicated typically when a variance is requested and the Board grants an approval for an accessory structure, there should be a specific location/placement of the accessory structure required from the petitioner.

 Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building Department, commented given this is a new construction site that would be active and the petitioner has indicted the storage containers would be placed close to the new building and located away from Telegraph Road.  Ms. McCullough stated the specific placement of the storage containers would hinder the construction project given this would be an active construction site. Ms. McCullough stated the existing 6-foot high wood fence and the proposed masonry screen wall would help alleviate the adjacent residents from the construction site.

Chairman Khederian addressed her concerns to the Board and indicated the construction trailer not having a timeframe to be placed on the construction site.

 Mr. Gut requested the construction trailer to be placed on site for the duration of the project.  Mr. Gut commented the projection start date is October 1st, 2007, given all disconnects from the public utilities have been provided for the demolition of the existing buildings on site.

 Ms. Sarkesian, resident at 6930 Telegraph Road, was present and questioned the length of the project and would Sandalwood Road be an access for construction vehicles.

 Mr. Gut replied Sandalwood Road would not be accessed or utilized during the construction project.

 Mr. Taylor suggested to the Board that the placement of the dumpsters be located away from the rear property line.  

Mr. Gut replied the dumpsters would be placed within the area of construction.  Mr. Gut commented the dumpsters would not be placed within the rear yard setback area of the building.

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Ms. Rosati in regards to the appeal at 6790, 6800, and 6810 Telegraph Road for the installation of two (2) temporary trailers, three (3) construction/refuse dumpsters, and two (2) open storage containers, that the request be approved as submitted, with the contingency that the dumpsters not be placed within the rear yard setback of the property, and the variance for the installation of two (2) temporary trailers located in front yards, to allow the 6-foot high fencing located in the front and rear yards along the westerly lot line to remain after demolition of the main structure, to allow three (3) construction/refuse dumpsters and two (2) open storage containers to remain on site in front yards, be granted.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty.  The landscape plan as presented for the construction trailer will require (8-12) evergreens to be installed.  Access to the construction site from Sandalwood Road will be eliminated.  The trailers are to be removed from the construction site (15) months from commencement of construction.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.

Motion carried,  6 – 0.             

(15)  2400 Telegraph Road – Target Corporation

Seeking approval for the use of a proposed accessory structure, a 12’ x 70’ x 15’ high construction trailer from September 1st, 2007 until September 30th, 2008, screened with proposed plantings, located in a side yard 14 ft. from the westerly side lot line on Acreage Parcel, Section 5.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall not exceed fourteen (14) ft. in height, shall not be located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side or rear lot line, shall be screened with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-05-451-005; 19-05-377-023)

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich to move the item (15) 2400 Telegraph to the end of the agenda to allow the petitioner to be present.

Motion carried,  6 – 0. 

Ms. Rosati recused herself from the next item by indicating she resides within the Township’s notification area.

(7)  1315 Lone Pine Road – R. Glisky

Seeking approval for the construction of a proposed 6 ft. high cedar fence over a 4 ft. high existing concrete wall, having an overall height of 10 ft. screened with proposed plantings, located in a rear yard 4 ft. from the westerly side lot line and 12 ft. from the southerly rear lot line, Lot 23, The Dells of Bloomfield, Section 20.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be located closer than 16 ft. to any side or rear lot line, shall be screened from adjacent residences with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-566 states fences in a residential district shall not exceed 4 ft. in height.  (19-20-403-003) Chairman Khederian commented to the Board the petitioner was not present. 

Motion by Mr. Taylor, Seconded by Mr. Aldrich to deny the request without prejudice for the existing 6-foot high fence over the existing 4-foot high concrete wall with an overall height of 10-feet located within the required 16-feet side and rear yard setbacks. 

Motion failed due to allowing for public comments.

Chairman Khederian excused Board Member, Ms. Carol Rosati from the meeting.

Chairman Khederian questioned should the public hearing be heard for this variance request, prior to the Board taking action.

 Ms. Patti McCullough, Director of Planning and Building, replied the petitioner did not inform the Department that they would be absent for this meeting, therefore the Board should allow for the public hearing to be heard for the record.

Mr. James Long, resident at 5387 Echo Road, and President of the subdivision association, introduced the first homeowner.

Ms. Rebecca Kuehne, resident at 5033 Echo Road, was present and spoke in opposition of the existing concrete wall and fence.  Ms. Kuehne suggested to the Board to have the existing wall and fence removed or screened with evergreens to obscure the view from her residence.

Ms. Michelle Margosian, resident at 5374 Echo Road, and Vice President of the subdivision association, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.  Ms. Margosian made reference to the property at 1315 Lone Pine and indicated the existing wall and fence runs from 1315 Lone Pine Road through 1327 Lone Pine Road, which is owned by Mr. Richard Glisky.

Mr. Rober Heuer, resident at 5024 Forest Way, was present and spoke in opposition of the variance request.

Chairman Khederian questioned how long has the wall and fence existed.

Ms. Margosian replied the wall and fence have existed for approximately one year.

Ms. Brenda Schlutow, Township Ordinance Officer, was present and spoke in regards to the history of this property.  Ms. Schlutow stated the Township has been in contact with the property owner, Mr. Richard Glisky since December of 2006 for the existing fence and wall on this property.  Ms. Schlutow stated Mr. Glisky erected the fence and wall on the property at 1327 Lone Pine Road in December of 2006, and in March of 2007, the same fence and wall was being constructed on 1315 Lone Pine Road. Ms. Schlutow stated in March of 2007, the Ordinance Department became aware of the same type of wall and fence being installed at another property that Mr. Glisky owned at 1315 Lone Pine.  She further stated that the Ordinance Department informed Mr. Glisky at that time that he needed to apply for variances for both of the properties to avoid further legal action from the Township, since no approvals were granted and no permits were issued prior to the installation at either property.  She stated that although he did make the original application to the ZBA in January for the walls at 1327 Lone Pine, he was dropped from the agenda when he failed to supply the necessary information. Ms. Schlutow stated when he made the application to the Zoning Board in June; she stated she had incorrectly assumed that he was applying for approval for both lots, not just 1315 Lone Pine.  Ms. Schlutow agreed with the neighbors at tonight’s meeting in stating that she felt that they had lived with this situation long enough without any resolution and she would go forward with legal action against Mr. Glisky requiring him to either make the proper applications to the Zoning Board or remove the non-compliant walls.

Mr. Buckley questioned the location of the garage.

Ms. Kuehne made reference to the site plan and indicated the location of the garage.

Mr. Taylor made reference to the site plan presented and stated it appears that the fence and wall have been constructed within the utility easement. 

The Board discussed the history of the property and the options the property owner has had to address the violation since December 2006.  The Board further discussed making the motion and the possibilities of the petitioner not showing at the next meeting.

Ms. McCullough replied the Board has an opportunity to table this item to the next meeting to allow the property owner to be present.  Ms. McCullough stated at the next meeting if the property owner so chooses not to show, the Township would inform the property owner of his failure of not being present as requested from the previous meeting, which would result in further action from the Township.           

Motion by Mr. Aldrich, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regards to the appeal at 1315 Lone Pine Road for the existing 6-foot high fence over the existing 4-foot high concrete wall with an overall height of 10-feet, located within the required 16-foot side and rear yard setbacks be tabled to September 11th, 2007, meeting to allow the petitioner to be present to address the item before the Board and the concerns of the neighbors.

Motion carried, 4 – 1- 1.

YEAS:  Aldrich, Buckley, Reisinger, Khederian

NAYS:  Taylor   

ABSENT: Rosati

Mr. Taylor stated by giving the property owner more time was not necessary.  Mr. Taylor commented given notification of the public hearing was addressed and the property owner made an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals should be more than ample evidence of his opportunity to appear before the Board.  Mr. Taylor stated by the property owner not being present is disrespectful to the Board, the neighbors and to the Township.

Chairman Khederian stated the comments from the neighbors heard this evening would be part of the record.              

(15)  2400 Telegraph Road – Target Corporation

Seeking approval for the use of a proposed accessory structure, a 12’ x 70’ x 15’ high construction trailer from September 1st, 2007 until September 30th, 2008, screened with proposed plantings, located in a side yard 14 ft. from the westerly side lot line on Acreage Parcel, Section 5.  The Code of the Charter Township of Bloomfield, Chapter 42, Article IV, Section 42-559 states that accessory structures shall not be erected in any required yard, except a rear yard, shall not exceed fourteen (14) ft. in height, shall not be located closer than sixteen (16) ft. to any side or rear lot line, shall be screened with evergreen and deciduous material, which will obscure view twelve (12) months of the year, and shall require the review and approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.  (19-05-451-005; 19-05-377-023)

Chairman Khederian commented to the Board the petitioner was not present. 

Chairman Khederian opened the public comments for this item.

Ms. Diane Alexanian, resident at 1415 W. Square Lake Road, was present and questioned the location of the proposed construction trailer.

Ms. Patti McCullough, Planning and Building Director, made reference to the proposed site plan and indicated the 12’ x 70’ x 15’ high construction trailer would be placed off of Telegraph Road, 14-feet from the westerly side lot line. 

Ms. Kate Baxter, resident at 1445 W. Square Lake Road, was present and questioned would the site have access to Square Lake Road.  Ms. Baxter questioned the intent of the residential property purchased adjacent to the development.

Ms. McCullough replied Square Lake Road would not be accessed, only Telegraph Road.  Ms. McCullough commented Target has purchased a residential lot for screening purposes to the residential lot off of Square Lake Road.  She stated the current berm being installed would be heavily vegetated with landscaping, trees and shrubbery to be planted within that width of that single lot.

Ms. Baxter questioned the need for the construction trailer.

Ms. McCullough replied the purpose for the construction trailer is to allow for an on-site office for the construction management during the building of the new Target store.  Ms. McCullough made reference to the site plan and indicated the construction trailer would be at the most extreme point away from the residential properties.  She commented the construction trailer would be on site from September 1st, 2007 until September 30th, 2008, and to be screened with proposed plantings. 

Motion by Ms. Reisinger, Seconded by Mr. Buckley in regard to the appeal at 2400 Telegraph Road for the installation of a construction trailer be approved as submitted, and the variance for the installation of a 15-foot high construction trailer located in a side yard 16-feet from the side lot line be granted.  Based on the information presented, the applicant did demonstrate compliance with Section 42-55 Standards, and did demonstrate all of the standards for practical difficulty.  Petitioner must obtain all necessary permits.  The construction trailer to be screened with proposed plantings.  The construction trailer to be on site September 1st, 2007 until September 30th, 2008.   

     

Motion carried,  5 – 0.

   

IV. GENERAL BUSINESS

a.     Next Board Meeting – September 11th, 2007

 

V.      ADJOURNMENT

 

Respectfully submitted,

Patricia McCullough, Director
Planning and Building Department

kd

 

THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPROVALS SHALL BE VALID FOR A PERIOD NO LONGER THAN ONE YEAR UNLESS A BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED

IN THE EVENT THAT AN APPEAL IS APPROVED, CONTINGENT UPON THE SUBMITTAL OF AN AFFIDAVIT, PLEASE ALLOW UP TO FOURTEEN (14) BUSINESS DAYS TO PROCESS THE DOCUMENT.

APPROVED MINUTES WILL BE AVAILABLE ON LINE AND AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFTER THE NEXT SCHEDULED BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING.

 

 

 

Home  |  Government  |  Services  |  Community  |  Current Events  |  Resources
Contact Us  |  E-mail List  |  Forms

Still can't find what you're looking for?
Use our comprehensive Search or Site Map pages!

Charter Township of Bloomfield
4200 Telegraph Road
P.O. Box 489
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303-0489
248.433.7700

Click here to report website technical issues.
Need to contact the webmaster?  Click here.

This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher and Netscape 6.0 or higher.

Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Having trouble accessing our site forms? Your browser may not have the Acrobat Reader plug-in that is required.  Click here to download a free copy of this software.

Site Design/Development by
Bringing the World to Your Corner of the World

 

Proudly serving our community online since 1999.
Named #1 Township Website in Michigan by Cyber-state.org

Site Use Policy

All information © 2008 Bloomfield Township, Michigan 

 

Current Agendas
Latest Minutes

 
New Township Office Hours

 
Tax and Water Bill Payments

 
Pay your Rizzo bill online

 
Parcel/Property Taxpayer Info

 
Current Newsletter - Summer 2008 This document is available to view in PDF format.


 
Township Open House cancelled due to construction.

 
Household Hazardous Waste Day

 
August 5 Election Results

 
Lawn Care for Lakes Seminar

 
Township Gateway Sign Installed

 
Safety Path Millage Renewal

 
2007 Township Annual Report This document is available to view in PDF format.
2007 Water Report
Digital TV Transition

 
Capital Improvement Program