Contact Us
E-Mail List
Forms

Home Government Services Community Current Events Resources
Bloomfield Government
Current Events Overview
Township Annual Report
Administration
Agendas
Budget
Capital Improvement Program
Directory
Employment Opportunities
History Records
Links
Minutes
Ordinances and Resolutions
Organization Chart
Other Officials
Polling Locations and Precincts
Public Meetings
Trustees
Site Map

 

 
Advanced Search Options

 

Government > Minutes

Overview  |  Board of Trustees  |  Planning Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

Planning Commission Minutes

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, May 21, 2007
Bloomfield Township Hall

I. ATTENDANCE:

PRESENT: Salz, Stefanes, Mintz, Reisinger, Stark

ABSENT: Goldberg, Swoboda

Staff Present: Patricia McCullough, Planning and Building Director, Christopher Gruba, Assistant Planner, Robin Carley, Development Coordinator, Meghan Bonfiglio, Environmental Services Manager

Mr. William Hampton, Township Attorney, was present.

Mr. Dave Payne, Township Supervisor, was present in the audience.

 

II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion was made and was unanimously supported to approve the Planning Commission minutes of April 25, 2007 with a correction to the motion and the amended motion for the Target Store proposal.

YEAS: Salz, Stefanes, Mintz, Reisinger, Stark

NAYS: None

 

III. SITE PLAN REVIEW:

A. Bloomfield Fox Hills Association – Swim Club – 1822 Fox River Drive

Ms. McCullough introduced the request to allow for the use of a subdivision pool in a residential neighborhood by a swim club with the swim team comprised of subdivision members and guest members. The Fox Hills Swim Team has been in existence for several years and has been utilizing the subdivision pool for swim meets. Ms. McCullough noted that the Association’s efforts to sell guest memberships to non-residents had ceased. She reviewed the detailed submittal of the applicant, which addressed the criteria called out in the Township’s Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 401 (5a. – i.), for the granting of a special use permit by the Planning Commission. The applicant’s submittal was provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file. Departmental reports were also provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file along with the Design Review Board minutes.

Mr. Salz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners to Ms. McCullough

Mr. Mintz noted the submittal of the approval signatures of twelve residents within 150 feet of the pool, comprising the 100% requirement as noted in Article IV, Section 401, 5a.

Mr. Salz asked for the presentation from the applicant.

Ms. Pam Gaboury, 1963 Hunters Ridge, subdivision resident representing the swim team, noted that the parking plan had been modified based on the departmental report received from the Police Department. She stated that the swim team had been in existence for several years and requested that the use be allowed to continue.

Mr. Salz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners to the applicant.

Mr. Salz commented on the guest memberships and asked if it was necessary to have the non-resident memberships.

Ms. Gaboury stated that the Fox Hills Association was previously selling memberships to use the pool and that the selling of memberships had since ceased. She stated that the guest members were brought in by subdivision residents and that there were only 15 allowed and that they were only allowed for swim team practice and events. The 15 guests were tied to the swim team and not to the subdivision association swim club.

Mr. Salz noted all the letters and e-mails received, both in opposition and support, that were provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file.

Mr. Mintz questioned if submittals received after the Planning Commissioner packets were delivered were considered late and allowed as part of the record.

Ms. McCullough noted that the Planning Commission notice stated that comments could be received prior to the meeting or at the Commission meeting.

Mr. Salz opened the public comment portion of the meeting.

Mr. Dennis Scheiber, 524 Sedgefield Drive, was present in opposition. He noted the letter of opposition that he submitted on 05-21-07, which was provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file. He highlighted three issues as written in his letter, specifically the continuation of the operation of the swim team, hosting of duel meets and swim team events, and the inclusion of swimmers that have a primary residence outside of the Fox Hills subdivision. He also commented on the off-street parking issue and the lighting issue. He requested that the proposal be denied as requested on all counts.

Ms. Katie Haw, 432 Weybridge, a graduate of Lahser High School and pool lifeguard, was present in support of the request. She commented on her years as a swim team member and the positive memories and excellent life lessons she learned. Ms. Haw noted the self-confidence that she obtained through her experiences while on the team and requested that the swim team be allowed to continue its use of the subdivision pool.

Mr. Ron Portser, 655 S. Spinningwheel Lane, was present in opposition to the swim team’s non-resident guests. He questioned the liability issues and stated that he was never provided an insurance claim to address the liability issues of a non-resident swim team member that might be injured in the subdivision pool. Mr. Portser’s letter of opposition was provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file.

Mr. Ben Guthrie, 2076 Fox Glen Court and former Association Board member, was present in support of the request. He commented that the Association Board was willing to address the pool lighting if it appeared offensive to any resident. Mr. Guthrie noted that the letters received from the Township regarding the swim club were posted on the Association’s website. He also stated that he believed the Association swim club issues were being confused with swim team issues.

Mr. Mike Benninger, 537 Weybridge Drive, was present in support of the swim team and commented on the positive impact that being involved with the swim team had on his son. He also noted that the parking plan was well thought out and very considerate of the subdivision and the community.

Mr. Andrew Kurtz, a 24 year old subdivision resident and a product of the Fox Hills Swim team, was present in support of the request. He commented on the positive impact the swim team had on his development and that his experiences through the years on the swim team led him to make positive decisions and that he eventually became a NCAA swimmer.

Mr. Calhoun, parent of a non-resident member of the swim team, was present in support of the request.

Ms. Mary Nimbach, 591 S. Spinngwheel Lane, was present in opposition to the swim club having meets at the subdivision pool and allowing non-resident members.

Mr. Bruce Kazamarik, 21 year-old resident and swimming pool manager, was present in support of the request. He commented on the need for adequate lighting for safety of the swimmers and that the removal of the trees was greatly needed. He also commented on the importance of having home swim team meets to allow for the generation of revenue to provide funding for pool equipment needed by the swimmers.

Ms. Michelle Haw, 432 Weybridge, was present in support of the request and stated that she was not adversely affected by the new lighting or removal of the trees. She also noted that safety was their primary concern.

Ms. Ann Borkel, subdivision resident and parent representative of the swim team, was present in support of the request. She commented that they were very lucky that the other teams within the league accommodated them for this year only, however, if they could not hold home meets in the future, they would be removed from the league and would not be able to continue as a team.

There were no additional public comments and Mr. Salz closed the public hearing.

Mr. Salz recognized Mr. Bill Hampton, Township Attorney, and requested his comments.

Mr. Hampton referred to his letter dated April 5, 2007, as provided to the Commissioners, and noted that the parking issues must be addressed and that the allowance of the non-resident members should also be addressed by the Commission.

Ms. Stefanes commented that the existence of the subdivision pool and the existing swim team were a benefit to the subdivision and recommended that the Township allow the use to continue.

Mr. Salz called for a motion.

Motion was made by Mintz, seconded by Reisinger, to forward the request to the Township Board of Trustees with a recommendation for a one year approval, for the 2007 swim season, subject to meeting the following criteria:

Adherence to the applicant’s submitted parking policy to adequately address the increase in traffic and parking demands during the 3 annual swim team meets,

Allowing the inclusion of a maximum of 15 non-resident swimmers each year,

Complying with the Township Department comments, and adherence with all Fire Department requirements.

Mr. Salz asked for discussion of the motion.

Mr. Stark commented that he would be in favor of allowing non-resident members for future considerations of this approval.

Mr. Salz stated that he believed that the lighting issues and parking issues were very important issues and must be addressed again with any future approvals. He also stated that selling non-resident memberships was not allowed.

The applicant stated as a point of issue that the swim team only operated during daylight hours.

Mr. Salz called for a vote on the motion. The motion carried unanimously.

YEAS: Salz, Stefanes, Mintz, Reisinger, Stark

NAYS: None

 

IV. SITE PLAN REVIEW / REZONING:

A. Bloomfield Park (Township Portion) – New Construction

Ms. McCullough introduced the proposal as submitted by Coventry II DDR Harbor Bloomfield Phase 1 LLC, for commercial development within Bloomfield Township on the northeasterly side of Telegraph Road, north of Square Lake Road, between Calico Corners at 1933 Telegraph Road and Uncle Ed’s Oil Change at 1995 Telegraph Road. The staff report, as provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file, was reviewed in detail by Ms. McCullough. She highlighted the overall site plan dated 04-20-07, including the existing zoning and the proposed rezoning of Lots 31 and 32 from an R-P, Research Park zone district, to a B-3, General Business zone district, to allow for the development of a new cinema. Ms. McCullough reviewed the proposed buildings, noting the entire development site was divided into two development parcels, Development Parcel A and Development Parcel B, separated by a proposed road, Restaurant Row.

Development Parcel A consists of the existing Bloomfield Market Center at 1939 Telegraph (labeled as BP2) with proposed buildings BP3 and BP4. The existing Calico Corner Store at 1933 (labeled as BP1) was included with Development Parcel A, however, the applicant does not own the Calico Corner site and must submit written confirmation of Calico’s consent prior to any approvals which might include this site in the proposal. There were 7 separate variances noted for Development Parcel A, including setback variances, loading space variances, and parking variances.

Development Parcel B consists of proposed buildings BP5 and BP6 and a proposed cinema, labeled as BP-Cin. There were 12 separate variances noted for Development Parcel B, including setback variances, loading space variances, building height variance, sign variance, and parking variances.

The screening and landscaping of the site were reviewed, noting that the Township had retained the firm of Michael J. Dul & Associates as a consultant landscape architect. Mr. Dul’s review letter was provided to the Commission and submitted to the file.

Parking and traffic circulation issues were discussed, noting that the Township’s consultant traffic engineer, Mr. Michael Labadie with Tetra Tech, had reviewed the proposal. Mr. Labadie’s report, dated May 17, 2007, was provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file, noting the deficiencies as called out in Mr. Labadie’s report.

The Township Departmental reports were reviewed, as provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file, noting several issues yet to be addressed with the various departments, including Police, Fire, Building, and Engineering & Environmental.

Mr. Salz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners to Ms. McCullough.

Mr. Mintz complimented Ms. McCullough on her professionalism in presenting the applicant’s request and noted that the applicant’s submission was woefully inadequate. He did not believe that the Commission had the required information to perform an accurate review.

Mr. Salz asked if the parking requirements were being met for the Township portion of the project.

Ms. McCullough noted that the shared parking analysis was still being revised and what had been submitted by the applicant had not yet received the approval of our consultants.

Mr. Stark questioned the capacity of the cinema and also questioned the number of parking spaces provided in the proposed parking buildings D, E, and F.

Ms. McCullough reviewed the proposed parking for the site, noting that several parking variances were needed to accommodate the proposed buildings within the Township.

Mr. Salz asked for the presentation from the applicant.

Mr. Gary Ceepo, Sr. Development manager for DDR, was present along with several members of the design team, including representation from Meachem and Apel Architects and Giffels Webster Engineering.

Mr. Ceepo provided a PowerPoint presentation which included the history of

DDR, its existing assets and existing commercial sites.

Mr. Dan Peas, Meachem & Apel, reviewed the overall site plan of the entire Bloomfield Park project, noting the elements of the proposed Town Center, including the dynamics of the open spaces, streetscapes, and corridors. Concept elevations of several streetscapes within the development were presented. The proposed materials were comprised of brick, cast stone, glass, and metal panels. The landscaping component for both the Bloomfield Township portion of the project and the 425 Agreement portion was reviewed. Site amentias, including benches, fountains, and landscape monuments were also presented.

Mr. Rich Lansau, Walker Parker TrafficConsultants, reviewed the overall concept of shared parking, including time of day, day of the week and synergy of uses. He commented on the new planning objectives for approaching parking requirements, including the concept of shared parking. A detailed analysis of the proposed parking for the Bloomfield Park project was reviewed. Travel distances from the proposed parking areas to the cinema were also reviewed.

Mr. Salz asked if there were any questions or comments from the Commissioners to the applicant.

Mr. Mintz noted that Mr. Lansau’s presentation was compiled prior to the report provided by Mr. Michael Labadie’s report dated May 17, 2007

Mr. Hampton questioned the placement of the restaurants proposed for restaurant row and if the applicant would be requesting liquor licenses for those restaurants. He noted that the Township’s ordinance would require frontage on frontage on Telegraph Road, due to the minimum right-of-way widths required within the Township’s liquor license ordinance.

There were no additional questions from the Commissioners.

Mr. Salz opened the public comment portion of the meeting.

There were no public comments and Mr. Salz closed the public hearing.

Mr. Salz called for a motion.

Motion was made by Mintz, seconded by Stefanes, and was unanimously supported to table the site plan and rezoning request to allow for the petitioner to apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the required variances. The Township Departments will be allowed to review any revisions submitted after the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting, prior

Mr. Salz asked for discussion of the motion.

Mr. Hampton commented on tabling to a date certain or tabling for an indefinite period of time, to reappear before the Planning Commission.

Ms. McCullough noted that the next Zoning Board of Appeals meeting was scheduled for June 12, 2007, with the next available Planning Commission meeting scheduled for July 16, 2007.

YEAS: Salz, Stefanes, Mintz, Reisinger, Stark

NAYS: None

 

V. GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Items not on the Agenda

There were no additional items to be discussed.

B. Next Commission Meeting Date

The next Planning Commission meeting was scheduled for Monday, June 4, 2007.

 

VI. ADJOURNMENT:

The Planning Commission Meeting of Monday, March 19, 2007 was adjourned at 9:25 P.M.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Patricia McCullough, Director

Planning and Building

 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
LOCAL WETLANDS HEARING
Monday, May 21, 2007
Bloomfield Township Hall

I. ATTENDANCE:

PRESENT: Salz, Stefanes, Mintz, Reisinger, Stark

ABSENT: Goldberg, Swoboda

Staff Present: Patricia McCullough, Planning and Building Director, Christopher Gruba, Assistant Planner, Robin Carley, Development Coordinator, Meghan Bonfiglio, Environmental Services Manager

Mr. William Hampton, Township Attorney, was present.

Mr. Dave Payne, Township Supervisor, was present in the audience.

 

II. LOCAL WETLANDS HEARING:

A. Bloomfield Park (Township Portion) – New Construction

Ms. McCullough noted that the Planning Commission also acted as the Township’s Wetlands Board and reviewed the wetland permit application as submitted by Coventry II DDR Harbor Bloomfield. Ms. McCullough’s staff report, as provided to the Commissioners, was reviewed and submitted to the file. The proposal included:

Utilizing the on-site wetlands to store all site storm water,

Filling of 4,314 sf of wetland and mitigate at a 1.2:1 ratio in one of eight mitigation sites,

Permanently impacting approximately 5,400 sf of natural features setback and create / restore approx. 2,000sf of natural features setback,

Using the existing 15-inch pipe that flows toward Telegraph Road as the outlet for all site storm water.

The wetland report from Dr. Steve Niswander of Niswander Environmental, LLC as provided to the Commissioners was reviewed and submitted to the file. Ms. McCullough noted Dr. Niswander’s recommended conditions for approval of the wetland use permit. The report dated May 10, 2007 from Mr. James Burton of Hubbell, Roth & Clark, Inc., included review of the submitted storm water calculations. His report was reviewed for the Commissioners and submitted to the file.

Dr. Steve Niswander commented on his concern for any future connection of the north and south wetland ponds. He noted that the ponds were now not connected and were proposed to not be connected. He also noted that the petitioner had addressed his concern regarding the fluctuation of the water elevation within the south pond. Dr. Niswander noted the proposed mitigation areas throughout the entire site. He also commented on the proposed loading areas and access sidewalks within the natural features setback areas, including at the rear of the proposed cinema, and recommended that the encroachments within these areas not occur.

Mr. Salz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners to Ms. McCullough or Dr. Niswander.

The Commission questioned what problems might arise in the future.

Dr. Niswander commented on possible erosion issues and also landscaping issues.

Mr. Salz asked for the presentation from the applicant.

Mr. John O’Meara, Environmental Consultants, was present and concurred with the comments as made by Ms. McCullough and Dr. Niswander.

There were no additional questions or comments.

Mr. Salz opened the public comment portion of the meeting.

There were no public comments and Mr. Salz closed the public comment portion of the meeting.

Mr. Salz called for a motion.

Motion was made by Stefanes, seconded by Stark, and was unanimously supported to approve the wetlands permit for the activities as proposed subject to meeting the conditions as noted in Dr. Niswander’s report dated 05-11-07 and the conditions as noted in Mr. Burton’s report dated 05-10-07, and for the applicant to return to the Planning Commission for consideration of the site plan and rezoning request.

YEAS: Salz, Stefanes, Mintz, Reisinger, Stark

NAYS: None

 

III. ADJOURNMENT:

The Local Wetlands Hearing was adjourned at 10:00 P.M.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Patricia McCullough, Director

Planning and Building

 

 

 

Home  |  Government  |  Services  |  Community  |  Current Events  |  Resources
Contact Us  |  E-mail List  |  Forms

Still can't find what you're looking for?
Use our comprehensive Search or Site Map pages!

Charter Township of Bloomfield
4200 Telegraph Road
P.O. Box 489
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303-0489
248.433.7700

Click here to report website technical issues.
Need to contact the webmaster?  Click here.

This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher and Netscape 6.0 or higher.

Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Having trouble accessing our site forms? Your browser may not have the Acrobat Reader plug-in that is required.  Click here to download a free copy of this software.

Site Design/Development by
Bringing the World to Your Corner of the World

 

Proudly serving our community online since 1999.
Named #1 Township Website in Michigan by Cyber-state.org

Site Use Policy

All information © 2008 Bloomfield Township, Michigan 

 

Current Agendas
Latest Minutes
New Township Hours
Tax/Water Bill Payments
Rizzo Bill payments
Property/Taxpayer Info
Township Ordinances
Current Newsletter

 
Yard Waste Collection ends December 12

 
Foreclosure Process Information

 
November 4 General Election

 
Fire Dept office location change

 
Township Gateway Sign Installed

 
Safety Path Millage Renewal

 
2007 Township Annual Report This document is available to view in PDF format.
2007 Water Report
Digital TV Transition

 
Capital Improvement Program