Contact Us
E-Mail List
Forms

Home Government Services Community Current Events Resources
Bloomfield Government
Current Events Overview
Township Annual Report
Administration
Agendas
Budget
Capital Improvement Program
Directory
Employment Opportunities
History Records
Links
Minutes
Ordinances and Resolutions
Organization Chart
Other Officials
Polling Locations and Precincts
Public Meetings
Trustees
Site Map

 

 
Advanced Search Options

 

Government > Minutes

Overview  |  Board of Trustees  |  Planning Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

Planning Commission Minutes

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, March 7, 2005
Bloomfield Township Hall

I. ATTENDANCE:

PRESENT: Mintz, Salz, Stefanes, Swoboda, Reisinger, Goldberg

ABSENT: Wittbold

Staff Present: Patricia McCullough, Planning and Building Director and Robin Carley, Planning Secretary

Mr. Dave Payne, Township Supervisor, was also present in the audience.

 

II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion was made Reisinger, seconded by Salz and was unanimously supported to approve the Commission minutes of February 7, 2005.

 

III. PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance re: Liquor License

Ms. McCullough presented this item to the Commission regarding revising the current liquor license requirements within the B-2 and B-3 zone districts. This topic was being discussed at the request of the Supervisor’s Office, responding to questions from restaurant owners, realtors, and residents regarding locations for existing and proposed restaurants allowed to obtain liquor licenses. Ms. McCullough noted that the Commissioners called for the Public Hearing at the February 7, 2005 Commission meeting and that the proper notification had been accomplished by advertising the proposed amendment within the local newspaper. The existing criteria and standards were reviewed, along with the zoning classifications permitted for liquor licenses, noting that some existing restaurants with liquor licenses were currently not meeting some of the existing criteria. The map previously supplied to the Commissioners was reviewed along with the proposed language for the ordinance amendment. McCullough noted that the Township Board had previously reviewed this proposal and forwarded it on to the

Planning Commission to hold a public hearing for the purpose of amending the zoning ordinance, with proper advertisement within the local newspaper. She stated that any proposed restaurant use must still meet all the ordinance requirements, including the parking requirements. She also noted that this amendment would not allow for "bars" but for "bona fide" restaurant uses, meaning food service was primary, with incidental liquor consumption.

Ms. McCullough addressed the questions of the Commission from the February 7, 2005 meeting:

Regarding Section 701,1a, referring to the requirement of an affidavit from the licensee stating the percentage of gross income during the prior 12 month period: Ms. McCullough stated that if a restaurant with no previous record was applying, the Township would establish a "bona fide" restaurant through the application and review process. If the request were for a chain restaurant, the Township would possibly allow information to be submitted from other locations, for review purposes.

Regarding the Township having resort licenses:

Ms. McCullough stated that she had spoken with the Township’s attorney and that a resort license would only be allowed with approval from the Township.

Regarding the current -road right-of way requirement of 150 feet:

Ms. McCullough recommended that this width requirement remain as exists to eliminate any possible infiltration of liquor licenses into neighborhoods of the Township not currently allowed and into the B-2 and B-3 zone districts located on smaller thoroughfares. She stated she felt that the 150-foot right-of –way requirement was a necessary control factor.

Ms. McCullough, through her powerpoint presentation, reviewed proposed locations within the required zone districts that would be allowed liquor licenses under the proposed amendment.

Mr. Mintz opened the public hearing. No one was present within the audience on this item.

Mr. Mintz asked for questions or comments from the Commissioners.

Mr. Swoboda commented on Section 701, 1a, questioning how the degree of incidentalness would be determined relative to a bona fide restaurant. He questioned if floor plans would be reviewed along with space designated to restaurant / bar use.

Ms. McCullough stated that the requests for liquor licenses would be reviewed by the Planning Department, the Police Department, and the Supervisor’s Office, prior to review and approval by the Township Board of Trustees. She noted that the burden of proof was on the applicant to establish the use as a bona fide restaurant.

Ms. Stefanes questioned if the shopping center at the southwest corner of Squirrel Road and South Boulevard would be allowed liquor licenses.

Ms. McCullough stated that the shopping center in question was governed by a consent judgment and was not within the correct zone district.

Parking issues were discussed, noting that a proposed restaurant use must comply with the parking requirements in order to receive a liquor license. Ms. McCullough commented that an existing restaurant use was presumed to have met the parking criteria when it was established, and would thus be able to apply for a liquor license with compliance to the proposed ordinance criteria. A challenge would be presented for a retail use to convert to a restaurant use, especially within shopping centers, because of the increased parking requirements for restaurants. Ms. McCullough noted that the Zoning Board of Appeals was authorized to grant parking variances.

Mr. Mintz closed the public hearing.

Mr. Mintz called for a motion.

Motion was made by Stefanes, seconded by Salz and was unanimously supported to forward the proposed liquor license ordinance amendment to the Township Board of Trustees with a recommendation for approval.

YEAS: Mintz, Salz, Stefanes, Swoboda, Reisinger, Goldberg

NAYS: None

 

IV. SITE PLAN:

A. Detroit Country Day School – 3600 Bradway Boulevard – Classroom Addition

Ms. McCullough introduced this item to the Commission for the removal of the existing portable classroom and the construction of a one-story classroom addition to the west side of the school. Her staff report was reviewed and provided to the Commission, including review of the building design, screening and landscaping, setback and height requirements, and parking and circulation. Ms. McCullough stated that the parking and traffic circulation would not change but that the parking was currently non-conforming. She also noted that two variances would be required for the expansion of a non-conforming use on a site deficient in size for a school and for a 14-foot encroachment into the Lahser Road front yard setback. The Design Review Board had reviewed the proposal, including submittals of the site plan, colored elevations and proposed landscaping. The Departmental reports were reviewed, with no objections noted. Ms. McCullough stated that the school was not proposing to increase the size of the student body.

Mr. Mintz asked for comments or questions from the Commissioners to Ms. McCullough.

Ms. Reisinger commented on the existing parking situation and traffic flow, noting that it was in great need of improvement. She reviewed the traffic issues of the site, including the blockage of the surface streets during drop-off and pick-up times at the school.

Mr. Salz questioned the additional square footage of the proposed classroom.

Ms. McCullough stated that the proposal included additional hallways and storage but only one classroom.

Mr. Mintz asked for the presentation from the applicant.

Mr. Tim Casai, architect with TMP Associates, complimented Ms. McCullough on her presentation to the Commission and reviewed the history of the site, including the different architectural styles of the existing building due to several previous additions to the building. He stated that the brick for the new addition would match the brick of the existing building at the point of placement. He also noted that the school was not increasing the size of their student body or staff, but just adding one classroom to be used as a music room. Mr. Joe D’Angelo, Director of Detroit Country Day Junior School, was also present.

There were no questions from the Commissioners to the applicant.

Mr. Mintz opened the meeting for public comment.

Mr. Chuck Kirkpatrick, 3650 Tuckahoe, reviewed the history of the school site and commented on the existing traffic situation. He noted that there was not sufficient parking on the school grounds, that it was difficult to get in and out of his driveway during pick-up and drop-off times, and that the school needed to provide more help in correcting the situation.

Mr. Ed Baumgartner, 3575 Roland Drive, also expressed concern regarding the traffic flow situation and its affect on Roland Drive, Tuckahoe Road and Bradway Boulevard. He also referred to a letter received from Carolyn Groebel expressing these same concerns.

Mr. Clint Hurst, 3636 Tuckahoe, stated that he felt the school was operating as a commercial enterprise within the subdivision. He also expressed concerns regarding the traffic situation and the parking in front of the fire hydrant on his street and the blocking of his driveway with parked cars during school functions.

Mr. Larry Nutson, Bloomfield Village Manager, stated that the Association Board of Trustees had approved the plans for the removal of the temporary portable classroom with the new classroom addition, noting that the addition was not intended to allow for increased student enrollment at the school. His letter was provided to the Commissioners and submitted to the file. Mr. Nutson commented on similar traffic concerns at Covington School, within the Village, and that the Village Police and Township Police were addressing this concern.

Mr. Joe D’Angelo addressed the traffic situation, stating that letters had been sent to the parents requesting their cooperation in this matter and that the school employed security guards for school functions that could be instructed to patrol the streets and monitor the traffic situation. He also suggested that the entrance driveway from Tuckahoe could be widened to relieve the traffic back-up on Tuckahoe. The addition of "no parking" signage was also suggested.

Mr. Mintz closed the public hearing and asked for comments and questions from the Commissioners.

Dr. Goldberg questioned if parking could be utilized at the adjacent shopping center, the Village Knoll.

Mr. Nutson stated that the question could be directed to the landlord of the center.

Further discussion took place among the Commissioners regarding the existing parking situation and traffic circulation on and off the site. They expressed concern with the blockage of the neighborhood streets, including limiting access to the neighborhood with emergency vehicles. They commented that the school might have to sacrifice some of the athletic field area for parking spaces. They also noted that the Village was anxious for the removal of the existing portable classroom.

Mr. Dave Payne stated that the Township would look into the traffic concerns and would address the issues with the Township’s and Village’s Police and Fire Departments, working closely with representatives of the school.

Motion was made by Stefanes, seconded by Reisinger and was unanimously supported to forward this project, with a recommendation for approval, to the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Township Board of Trustees, with application to seek the following variances:

To expand a nonconforming use with the proposed building addition located on an existing 3 acre site rather than a 10 acre parcel as required by Ordinance,

To allow for a 26 foot front yard setback along Lahser Road rather than the 40 foot setback as required by Ordinance.

The traffic concerns, as expressed by the neighbors, are to be addressed with the Township and Village Police and Fire Departments and representatives of Detroit Country Day Schools.

IV. GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Commission Meeting Date

The next Planning Commission Meeting was tentatively scheduled for Monday, March 21, 2005 at 7:00 P.M.

 

V. ADJOURNMENT.

The Planning Commission Meeting of Monday, March 7, 2005 was adjourned at 8:35 P.M.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Patricia McCullough, Director

Planning and Building

 

 

 

Home  |  Government  |  Services  |  Community  |  Current Events  |  Resources
Contact Us  |  E-mail List  |  Forms

Still can't find what you're looking for?
Use our comprehensive Search or Site Map pages!

Charter Township of Bloomfield
4200 Telegraph Road
P.O. Box 489
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303-0489
248.433.7700

Click here to report website technical issues.
Need to contact the webmaster?  Click here.

This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher and Netscape 6.0 or higher.

Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Having trouble accessing our site forms? Your browser may not have the Acrobat Reader plug-in that is required.  Click here to download a free copy of this software.

Site Design/Development by
Bringing the World to Your Corner of the World

 

Proudly serving our community online since 1999.
Named #1 Township Website in Michigan by Cyber-state.org

Site Use Policy

All information © 2008 Bloomfield Township, Michigan 

 

Current Agendas
Latest Minutes
New Township Hours
Tax/Water Bill Payments
Rizzo Bill payments
Property/Taxpayer Info
Township Ordinances
Current Newsletter

 
Yard Waste Collection ends December 12

 
Foreclosure Process Information

 
November 4 General Election

 
Fire Dept office location change

 
Township Gateway Sign Installed

 
Safety Path Millage Renewal

 
2007 Township Annual Report This document is available to view in PDF format.
2007 Water Report
Digital TV Transition

 
Capital Improvement Program