Contact Us
E-Mail List
Forms

Home Government Services Community Current Events Resources
Bloomfield Government
Current Events Overview
Township Annual Report
Administration
Agendas
Budget
Capital Improvement Program
Directory
Employment Opportunities
History Records
Links
Millage Renewals
Minutes
Ordinances and Resolutions
Organization Chart
Other Officials
Polling Locations and Precincts
Public Meetings
Trustees
Site Map

 

 
Advanced Search Options

 

Government > Minutes

Overview  |  Board of Trustees  |  Planning Commission
Zoning Board of Appeals

Planning Commission Minutes

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, February 7, 2005
Bloomfield Township Hall

I. ATTENDANCE:

PRESENT: Mintz, Swoboda, Stefanes, Reisinger, Salz, Goldberg

ABSENT: Wittbold

Staff Present: Patricia McCullough, Planning and Building Director and Robin Carley, Planning Secretary

 

II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion was made Salz and was unanimously supported to approve the Commission minutes of January 19, 2005.

 

III. CALL FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Introduce Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance re: Liquor License

Ms. McCullough introduced this item to the Commission regarding revising the current liquor license requirements within the B-2 and B-3 zone districts. This topic was being discussed at the request of the Supervisor’s Office, responding to questions from restaurant owners, realtors, and residents regarding locations for existing and proposed restaurants allowed to obtain liquor licenses. The existing criteria and standards were reviewed, along with the zoning classifications permitted for liquor licenses, noting that some existing restaurants with liquor licenses were currently not meeting some of the existing criteria. A map was submitted for the Commission’s review, showing the permitted locations within the existing B-2 and B-3 zone districts. The proposed language for the ordinance amendment was also provided to the Commissioners for their review. Ms. McCullough noted that the Township Board had reviewed this proposal and forwarded it on to the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing for the purpose of amending the zoning ordinance, with proper advertisement within the local newspaper. She stated that any proposed restaurant use must still meet all the ordinance requirements, including the parking requirements. Ms. McCullough commented on the interest of the

Township to provide quality restaurants with a greater menu and drink selection so that Township residents would not need to go outside the Township for this type of restaurant.

Mr. Salz questioned why parking requirements were greater for a restaurant use as opposed to retail use.

Ms. McCullough commented that generally the requirements refer to the expected turnover due to seating capacity, and that the operations of each were very different. Ms. McCullough stated that different parking requirements for different restaurant uses would be addressed during discussion of the parking requirements currently before the Planning Commission as a discussion item.

Ms. Reisigner commented on the times of expected use, or hours of operation, for restaurant uses vs. commercial uses.

Dr. Goldberg questioned if the current restaurants with liquor licenses would be allowed to continue, even if they did not meet the proposed criteria.

Ms. McCullough commented that they would be considered an existing non-conforming use.

Ms. Reisinger commented that the liquor license did not run with the land, but with the business, using as an example the former Chi’Chi’s site which is being developed as a senior assisted living facility.

Ms. McCullough stated that the Township has the ability to have 28 Class C liquor licenses, based on the population, with only 15 licenses being used. She stated that she did not feel the Township would be inundated by requests but that this amendment may allow for a couple of opportunities.

Possible locations for future liquor licenses were discussed. Ms. McCullough noted that several of the existing shopping centers were very limited or deficient in parking and would thus not be allowed additional restaurant uses.

Mr. Mintz questioned if this amendment would impact the current parking requirements discussion before the Commission.

Ms. McCullough stated that the proposed amendments would not conflict but would be blended together. She commented that parking was only one component that would be addressed with this proposed liquor license amendment. She did not feel that the liquor license amendment should be held up pending the parking study review.

Mr. Mintz commented on the proposed amendment, Section 701, 1a, referring to the requirement of an affidavit from the licensee stating the percentage of gross income during the prior 12 month period. He questioned compliance with this statement if it was a new business with no previous record.

Ms. McCullough stated that she would pursue his comments with the Township’s attorney.

Dr. Goldberg questioned what sites might be available for future Class C applicants.

Ms. McCullough cited as examples the following: Fuddruckers, The Gallery, Steve’s Deli, and perhaps a future location at the Bloomfield Town Square shopping center, due to their abundance of parking spaces.

Mr. Salz questioned if the Township had resort licenses available.

Ms. McCullough stated she did not believe the Township has resort licenses, but that they did have package sales within the Township.

Requirements for application and transfer of licenses were discussed. It was noted that the LCC was the regulative body for the State of Michigan and that the Township Board of Trustees was the regulative for the Township that would be responsible for reviewing and approving the licenses.

Mr. Salz questioned the required width of the road right-of-way, commenting that the 150-foot width might be too restrictive.

Ms. Stefanes commented that Beau Jacks’ location on Maple Road would not meet the 150-foot right-of-way requirement.

Mr. Salz commented that perhaps the requirement should be more concerned with the volume of the thoroughfare and not just the width. He commented that relaxing the requirements for liquor licenses might attract more quality restaurants.

Ms. Stefanes questioned if Fuddruckers would meet the requirements of this amendment.

Ms. McCullough stated that it was an existing restaurant and that the parking requirements were met when the restaurant was approved for the shopping center.

Motion was made by Stefanes, seconded by Salz and was unanimously supported to hold a public hearing with responses to the questions and concerns presented at this meeting to be addressed by staff at the public hearing to be held on Monday, March 7, 2005.

YEAS: Mintz, Swoboda, Stefanes, Reisinger, Salz, Goldberg

NAYS: None

 

IV. GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Commission Meeting Date

The next Planning Commission Meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 7:00 P.M.

B. Election of Officers

Ms. McCullough noted that the Planning Commission had previously adopted by-laws and that the document called for a yearly election of officers.

Mr. Mintz opened the floor for nominations:

Ms. Stefanes nominated Mr. Mintz to continue as Chairman of the Planning Commission.

Mr. Swoboda nominated Mr. Salz as the new Vice-Chairman of the Planning Commission, replacing Mr. Swoboda.

Mr. Mintz nominated Ms. Stefanes to continue as Secretary of the Planning Commission.

Mr. Mintz asked for a consensus vote of the Commission.

All were in favor of the nominated positions.

C. Planning Commission By-Laws

Ms. McCullough commented that the by-laws were previously adopted and would stand as written unless amended by the Commission.

Motion was made by Stefanes, seconded by Reisinger and was unanimously supported to ratify the previous adoption of the Planning Commission By-Laws, to remain as written.

YEAS: Mintz, Swoboda, Stefanes, Reisinger, Salz, Goldberg

NAYS: None

Ms. McCullough commented on the scheduled meeting for Monday, October 3, 2005, noting it was the start of Rosh Hashanah.

The Commission agreed to cancel the first meeting of October and hold only one meeting on the third Monday of October. It was noted that if there were scheduling issues, the Commission would consider rescheduling the first meeting of October.

 

V. ADJOURNMENT.

The Planning Commission Meeting of Monday, February 7, 2005 was adjourned at 7:35 P.M.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Patricia McCullough, Director
Planning and Building

 

 

 

Home  |  Government  |  Services  |  Community  |  Current Events  |  Resources
Contact Us  |  E-mail List  |  Forms

Still can't find what you're looking for?
Use our comprehensive Search or Site Map pages!

Charter Township of Bloomfield
4200 Telegraph Road
P.O. Box 489
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303-0489
248.433.7700

Click here to report website technical issues.
Need to contact the webmaster?  Click here.

This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher and Netscape 6.0 or higher.

Adobe Acrobat Reader Logo Having trouble accessing our site forms? Your browser may not have the Acrobat Reader plug-in that is required.  Click here to download a free copy of this software.

Site Design/Development by
Bringing the World to Your Corner of the World

 

Proudly serving our community online since 1999.
Named #1 Township Website in Michigan by Cyber-state.org

Site Use Policy

All information © 2008 Bloomfield Township, Michigan 

 

Current Agendas
Latest Minutes

 
New Township Office Hours

 
Tax and Water Bill Payments

 
Pay your Rizzo bill online

 
Parcel/Property Taxpayer Info

 
Current Newsletter - Summer 2008 This document is available to view in PDF format.


 
Township Open House cancelled due to construction.

 
Household Hazardous Waste Day

 
August 5 Election Results

 
Lawn Care for Lakes Seminar

 
Township Gateway Sign Installed

 
Safety Path Millage Renewal

 
2007 Township Annual Report This document is available to view in PDF format.
2007 Water Report
Digital TV Transition

 
Capital Improvement Program